SaintsFanInLA
BREES SMASH!!
Offline
My team is better than yours. Our coaches are better than your coaches. Our players are better than your players and if it turns out not to be the case, it's only because of the one time luck of your team. If it's more than one time, it is still luck.
When my team wins, it's because our coaches, staff and players executed brilliantly. When your team wins, it's strictly because the refs were cheating and your team got lucky.
When my team loses, it's because the refs were cheating. When your team loses, it's because they got outplayed.
Whatever our players do on or off of the field, it's awesome and totally acceptable but if your teams has players to do the exact same thing, not only is it NOT the exact same thing but it's very different. And when THEY do it, it's deplorable and they should be sanctioned and punished greatly.
Whatever formula that I devise to show my players and team to have supremacy over yours is THE ONLY formula that should be used. And if by chance someone else uses my EXACT SAME FORMULA to prove that HIS/HER team and players are better, then that formula must then take into account, rare and esoteric factors that I will determine to have far more weight than actual facts and data. IF by some chance my new method of determining supremacy is proven to be inneffective, then I will then devise a new one and totally ignore my previous method.
If my team has a championship or championships, then that is the ONLY thing that matters when discussing the legacy of teams and should be used to lord over other teams who have none. If by chance my team has more than one championship and am comparing it to another team with a championship, I must then lord the fact that my team has MORE over that other team because they don't count as they are not on our level. It doesn't matter how long ago my team's championships were, it's the end all be all.
If my team has no championships, then championships are highly overrated and winning percentage is what REALLY counts if my team has a higher regular season winning percentage than yours. If you have a better win percentage, then something ELSE will make my team better. If your championship was more than a year ago, you are living in the past. You should let it go!
If my team has a championship(s) but fewer than yours, championships are nice but OTHER records that my team may possess are more important. If my team has a player that has great numbers, that's ALL we should talk about.
Anyone calling himself a fan of our team but criticizes our coaches, players or organization is obviously a troll and should be permabanned or at the very least is a bandwagoner and I can't wait for the first tough stretch of losses so that all of the bandwagoners can disappear.
Anyone calling himself a fan of our team and compliments coaches, players or organization is an insightful poster and a welcome addition to our site.
Any fan from another team that comes to this site and criticizes our players, coaches or organization is a troll, an idiot and why doesn't he go back to his own board, his life must be shallow and empty. If his post count is to low, he's and idiot who just joined to troll. If his post count is too high, he is an idiot who just joined us to troll and again, his life must be shallow and empty.
Any fan from another team that comes to this site and praises our players, coaches or organization is an insightful poster and a welcome addition to our site. His post count is irrelevant.
If our former player is now on your team, he was on the decline, he taking up too much cap space and was a locker room cancer anyway, good riddance because you are sure to suck. If your former player is now on our team, he's a great addition, we got him on the cheap, CHAMPIONSHIP!!
My stadium/dome is faaaaaaaaaar superior to your stadium/dome. If my stadium/dome is old, it has character and has stayed true to the real nature of football. If your stadium/dome is old, then you are out of touch and will never host a Super Bowl.
If my stadium/dome is new we are keeping up with the times bringing in revenue to the city and will host many Super Bowls. If your stadium is new, your owners bilked the citizens out of taxpayer money, held your city ransom and is a cheapskate.
If we play outdoors, we are better because we can play in the elements like real football is supposed to be played therefore WE are tougher and we welcome the elements as only the real fans will come out and support us. If you play outdoors, nobody wants to sit in the rain and snow to watch a game that they've just dropped $200+ to see.
If we play indoors, we are better because our fans no matter what age can come and enjoy the game in total comfort no matter what time of year it is and if you are so tough outdoors where the conditions are so brutal, then SHOULDN'T you be better when the conditions are ideal?!?! If you play indoors, your records shouldn't count because of course you can pad stats when there is no wind or rain to impact the numbers. And your teams and players are soft.
My division is the toughest division. Your division is weak and overrated.
My conference is the tougher conference. Your conference is watered down.
ESPN is always riding your teams jock and they don't deserve it, your team deserves less coverage. ESPN is always disrespecting our team, we should have more coverage.
What about your player ______________?! Why is ESPN always giving him coverage?! He hasn't won anything. Or he hasn't won in X years. Or sure he won it all this year but so what? His stats weren't all THAT impressive.
What about our player _____________?! Why is ESPN never giving him coverage?!?! He hasn't won a Super Bowl yet but he has great stats. Or he was a Super Bowl X years ago, shouldn't that count?!?! Or he JUST won a Super Bowl., for goodness sakes!!
If an ESPN analyst says something bad about our players, coaches or organization; or something good about your team/organization then that analyst is an idiot and has no business discussing football because he has NO idea of what he is talking about.
If that SAME ESPN analyst says something good about my team, players and organization; or bad about yours team/organization, that analyst is brilliant and I have ALWAYS liked his insight, especially if he picked us to win it all this or next year.
ROGER GOODELL SUCKS!! (This really is universal.)
In closing, my team is the best at everything, yours is the worst and anything you can use to prove otherwise is worthless and MY City rocks while YOUR city sucks.
Thank you and good night.
When my team wins, it's because our coaches, staff and players executed brilliantly. When your team wins, it's strictly because the refs were cheating and your team got lucky.
When my team loses, it's because the refs were cheating. When your team loses, it's because they got outplayed.
Whatever our players do on or off of the field, it's awesome and totally acceptable but if your teams has players to do the exact same thing, not only is it NOT the exact same thing but it's very different. And when THEY do it, it's deplorable and they should be sanctioned and punished greatly.
Whatever formula that I devise to show my players and team to have supremacy over yours is THE ONLY formula that should be used. And if by chance someone else uses my EXACT SAME FORMULA to prove that HIS/HER team and players are better, then that formula must then take into account, rare and esoteric factors that I will determine to have far more weight than actual facts and data. IF by some chance my new method of determining supremacy is proven to be inneffective, then I will then devise a new one and totally ignore my previous method.
If my team has a championship or championships, then that is the ONLY thing that matters when discussing the legacy of teams and should be used to lord over other teams who have none. If by chance my team has more than one championship and am comparing it to another team with a championship, I must then lord the fact that my team has MORE over that other team because they don't count as they are not on our level. It doesn't matter how long ago my team's championships were, it's the end all be all.
If my team has no championships, then championships are highly overrated and winning percentage is what REALLY counts if my team has a higher regular season winning percentage than yours. If you have a better win percentage, then something ELSE will make my team better. If your championship was more than a year ago, you are living in the past. You should let it go!
If my team has a championship(s) but fewer than yours, championships are nice but OTHER records that my team may possess are more important. If my team has a player that has great numbers, that's ALL we should talk about.
Anyone calling himself a fan of our team but criticizes our coaches, players or organization is obviously a troll and should be permabanned or at the very least is a bandwagoner and I can't wait for the first tough stretch of losses so that all of the bandwagoners can disappear.
Anyone calling himself a fan of our team and compliments coaches, players or organization is an insightful poster and a welcome addition to our site.
Any fan from another team that comes to this site and criticizes our players, coaches or organization is a troll, an idiot and why doesn't he go back to his own board, his life must be shallow and empty. If his post count is to low, he's and idiot who just joined to troll. If his post count is too high, he is an idiot who just joined us to troll and again, his life must be shallow and empty.
Any fan from another team that comes to this site and praises our players, coaches or organization is an insightful poster and a welcome addition to our site. His post count is irrelevant.
If our former player is now on your team, he was on the decline, he taking up too much cap space and was a locker room cancer anyway, good riddance because you are sure to suck. If your former player is now on our team, he's a great addition, we got him on the cheap, CHAMPIONSHIP!!
My stadium/dome is faaaaaaaaaar superior to your stadium/dome. If my stadium/dome is old, it has character and has stayed true to the real nature of football. If your stadium/dome is old, then you are out of touch and will never host a Super Bowl.
If my stadium/dome is new we are keeping up with the times bringing in revenue to the city and will host many Super Bowls. If your stadium is new, your owners bilked the citizens out of taxpayer money, held your city ransom and is a cheapskate.
If we play outdoors, we are better because we can play in the elements like real football is supposed to be played therefore WE are tougher and we welcome the elements as only the real fans will come out and support us. If you play outdoors, nobody wants to sit in the rain and snow to watch a game that they've just dropped $200+ to see.
If we play indoors, we are better because our fans no matter what age can come and enjoy the game in total comfort no matter what time of year it is and if you are so tough outdoors where the conditions are so brutal, then SHOULDN'T you be better when the conditions are ideal?!?! If you play indoors, your records shouldn't count because of course you can pad stats when there is no wind or rain to impact the numbers. And your teams and players are soft.
My division is the toughest division. Your division is weak and overrated.
My conference is the tougher conference. Your conference is watered down.
ESPN is always riding your teams jock and they don't deserve it, your team deserves less coverage. ESPN is always disrespecting our team, we should have more coverage.
What about your player ______________?! Why is ESPN always giving him coverage?! He hasn't won anything. Or he hasn't won in X years. Or sure he won it all this year but so what? His stats weren't all THAT impressive.
What about our player _____________?! Why is ESPN never giving him coverage?!?! He hasn't won a Super Bowl yet but he has great stats. Or he was a Super Bowl X years ago, shouldn't that count?!?! Or he JUST won a Super Bowl., for goodness sakes!!
If an ESPN analyst says something bad about our players, coaches or organization; or something good about your team/organization then that analyst is an idiot and has no business discussing football because he has NO idea of what he is talking about.
If that SAME ESPN analyst says something good about my team, players and organization; or bad about yours team/organization, that analyst is brilliant and I have ALWAYS liked his insight, especially if he picked us to win it all this or next year.
ROGER GOODELL SUCKS!! (This really is universal.)
In closing, my team is the best at everything, yours is the worst and anything you can use to prove otherwise is worthless and MY City rocks while YOUR city sucks.
Thank you and good night.