Saint Spud
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2002
- Messages
- 14,699
- Reaction score
- 38,476
- Age
- 44
Offline
Rookies succeed at a much, much higher level in their first year than they did in 2011 or whenever. Regardless of position. Peyton Manning started as a rookie and threw more interceptions than touchdowns. Nowadays most pedestrian QBs and even some garbage guys like Mitch Trubisky do much better than that. If any rookie QB came in and put up Peyton's stats from his rookie year today, they'd be unanimously considered an insta-bust.
The gap between high-level college football and the NFL has shrunk significantly. At every position, too, not just QB. The schemes in college are more advanced and the NFL is actually stealing more college concepts than vice-versa.
So regardless of how you feel about salary cap/Brees/Taysom/whatever, the game has definitely changed. Rookies contribute much earlier and more significantly than they used to.
I don't believe that the only way to win is to have a QB on a rookie deal. But I also don't believe that the only way to win is to have a top flight veteran QB (as it was 10-15 years ago). In today's NFL you can do it either way.
The problem is that next year and beyond, we will have neither a top flight veteran QB or a good QB on a cheap deal. And thus the rebuild begins. So enjoy 2020 ya'll, because it could be ugly for a bit after that.
Also - just a random anecdotal thought. The Spurs were "past their window" in 2010. They won a title in 2014.
Agree with all this.
It's not that it's impossible to win with either a QB or a bunch of young players on a rookie deal. It's that your margin for error drops a lot and you need a lot more luck wrt health and hitting on late-round picks for depth.
And your point about rebuilding after 2020 is why I'd like to see us take a swing at moving up for a young QB this year. As Underhill tweeted, having Love "redshirt" for a year behind Brees would be ideal. Or Herbert or Hurts. I'd trust SP to make the right evaluation there.