Offline
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Nice.. confirms what we already know. The #2 position is a liability at the moment. They at least made an attempt to rectify it and are not satisfied moving forward. Sterling Moore/Breaux as your CB's by week 12.
Starting to realize that the trumping up of Crawley by SP was coach speak similar to what he did with Josh Hill after the Graham trade.
Starting to realize that the trumping up of Crawley by SP was coach speak similar to what he did with Josh Hill after the Graham trade.
Crawley was getting praise in preseason when Breaux, PJW and Swann were projected as #1-3 on the depth chart. I don't ever recall SP or anybody else trying to sell Crawley as a starting CB in his rookie season.
Crawley was getting praise in preseason when Breaux, PJW and Swann were projected as #1-3 on the depth chart. I don't ever recall SP or anybody else trying to sell Crawley as a starting CB in his rookie season.
We did well staying away from Haden. The long plan is Breaux and PJW with guys like Crawley as depth, and keep drafting well. Bringing in Haden's big contract and having to give up assets for him on top of that is the kind of foolish move that kept getting us into cap trouble the last few years.
Didn't say that and I understand he was forced into that position.
However about 2 weeks ago SP called Crawley a really good player etc etc and now its starting to look like he just didn't want to kill his confidence or give coaches a reason to pick on him. I'm not downing him but he should not be the #2 and we know that and we tried to do something about it in the short term but decided it wasn't worth the price.
Not sure if there is something wrong with what I said?
Crawley should be a 4th/5th DB at best as an Injury sub/developmental player.
Maybe I'm coming off as harsh IDK but I was just pointing out that we gave him a vote of confidence that hasn't lined up with his play and it was more or less confirmed by this thread. Because if what he said 2 weeks ago was legit...we'd be "moving forward" with him as the #2 but we obviously tried to upgrade him. Just like if Hill would have been the player we thought we were getting via that vote of confidence there would have been no need to sign Fleener this off-season.
Just was identifying coach speak. Don't mind me shrugs.