BiloxiSaint1
Veteran Starter
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2006
- Messages
- 6,807
- Reaction score
- 15,026
Offline
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The injury list was bad enough without that possibility. Ugh.Must mean that Armstead won't play...
I think that's a real possibility, but even if he does, it could mean the Saints want to go in to the game with an extra OL since we're now without a FB. Hill could play more as the FB and we could put a lineman in the blocking TE role for those packages.Must mean that Armstead won't play...
Must mean that Armstead won't play...
I think he'll play. But we need depth at the position in case something happens to aggravate the injury further.
Without Peat, who was our backup LT, the depth at that spot is an issue regardless.
Must mean that Armstead won't play...
Must mean that Armstead won't play...
Putting the TE Jason Vander Laan on IR is a little extreme then isn't it? I mean if the move was made just to have another tackle on the team, putting the TE on IR wasn't necessary. They could just cut him.