Online
oh how i miss the arguments on here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Just for the record, I'm not "poo-pooing" the trade. We won the trade and I'm glad we got the guy. I think he's exactly what we needed at the position, but I'm not expecting him to provide much more than solid veteran depth. Some here seem to look at his stats only and think that he's going to be an impact player, ignoring all the negatives. My comment was more on all the chatter about Alonso and the trade. It wasn't a "great" trade, it was a solid trade. It's what championship teams do to solidify their depth. But looking back at the thread I realized that most of it is just arguing. Now I feel silly because I actually added to the very thing I had issues with. LolI'll just end with this.
I'm not defending him, because I don't know him personally, nor do I feel he needs to be defended.
I'm defending the position that this is not just another Meh trade that adds veteran depth to a stacked position like you and many others have stated.
Rather, this is a Great signing that significantly upgrades the LB position not occupied by DD and was had by trading a 3rd year backup LB who was 4th or 5th on the depth chart.
Why anyone is poo-pooing this is mind boggling.
So, I don't know what to make of this trade after all. Is this guy going to be a starter for us?
...you combine Kiko and Anzalone, and you have Kiko Anzalone...
So, I don't know what to make of this trade after all. Is this guy going to be a starter for us?
What are the odds this guy takes Klein's job? Klein has had plenty of opportunities to impress & is not close to the player Davis is. And it is more obvious every game.
The point is Anthony wasn't a good player, even as a rookie. Yet he still had over 100 tackles. There are a ton of examples of players not playing well and having 100 tackles. I do like his durability and knack for forcing turnovers. But he hasn't been a Demario Davis level player at all.Been waiting for that example...
Only, it doesn't really hold water because he did it once. One season. That's it.
If Kiko would have been DROY and then never got back over 100 tackles or any turnovers or any of the other stats, then I could absolutely agree with you that the tackles stat would be 100% worthless for evaluating that player.
But when the player records 110+ tackles every season for multiple seasons the stat becomes legitimate. Again, it's the job of the position. LB's make tackles. They also play coverage and rush the passer at times, but their primary job play in and play out, is to make tackles. Add in the fact that he has forced multiple turnovers and TFL in those same seasons and it further elevates the tackle stat. It shows he's a complete player. And now you can't just call the tackle stat useless.
Whatever. I'm done arguing. Let's revisit this thread during the bye week and we'll see how which view point was more accurate.
Why isn't it enough that he makes our LB corps better?
Have you read the entire thread? There's an entire chapter on the merits, or lack thereof, for PFF ratings.It's not the end all, be all. But anything is better than tackling stats.