- Moderator
- #16
- Joined
- Sep 1, 1997
- Messages
- 17,205
- Reaction score
- 5,474
- Age
- 60
Offline
You have a point about the slow re-ordering after the preseason ranks. The reason I think it matters is because that's how strong they were at the time. There are many variable as to how a team moves up or down, so I won't get into it.
Case in point about where they were ranked at the time would be Oregon. Soon as Dixon went down, so did the team and their rank. If Dixon wouldn't have been injured, they'd be up in the ranks too (probably). Does that lessen the effect of another team's win over Oregon BEFORE the injury and while they were ranked in the Top 5 over waiting till the final rankings when they finished unranked?
It's a tough call -- I'll use your quote from another thread to show why I think the effect of another team's win over Oregon before the injury should be lessened...the injury proved that Oregon really wasn't that great of a TEAM.
Injuries can and do show weaknesses in a team's system and overall team talent. If you can't be just as competitive with a backup or two while you play unranked teams, then you have clearly shown that you are NOT the best team. If the USC loss is attributed to JDB being hurt, then it's the player that is very good, not the team.
Change USC to Oregon, and JDB to Dixon, and the statement is still very true. However, WITH those players they are tough, and teams should be given credit for beating them while at full strength. It's not an exact science, that's for sure...