Sean Payton and that timeout at 2:15 (1 Viewer)

Saint Kamara

Formerly SaintSproles and SaintReggie
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
38,767
Reaction score
51,592
Age
56
Location
Austin, TX
Offline
It's just utterly ridiculous.

You're going to save 15 seconds vs 40?
 

SaintsNY

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
3,673
Reaction score
6,629
Offline
he has no idea how to coach any more and its painfully obvious
 

Algsaint

SR is my life!
Joined
Aug 31, 2003
Messages
14,896
Reaction score
4,363
Offline
It's just utterly ridiculous.

You're going to save 15 seconds vs 40?
Made absolutely no sense . Having the timeout was more valuable than saving 15 seconds . Plus it was called after 1st down . The Giants still have 2 more downs to get a first down. Calling that timeout put absolutely no pressure on the Giants but shifted all the pressure to your defense to stop them.
 

Saintaholic

<><><><><><><><><><><>
VIP Contributor
Joined
Jul 8, 2000
Messages
17,586
Reaction score
29,609
Offline
Yeah I just don't get this guy's strategy with timeouts anymore. He has always used them at odd times.
 

saintology

Freshman
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
1,877
Reaction score
847
Online
IMO not that bad......last week TO usage was terrible. This week....he had a defense that was playing well, and was playing for the stop. I think under the circumstances he was just doing what nearly any coach would do. We have just succumb to expect the worst out of our defense in critical moments. They showed good signs of improvement today though despite being way undermanned.
 

darkhornet

LSU Grad '02
Joined
Jul 29, 2003
Messages
4,932
Reaction score
4,382
Age
42
Location
Plano, TX (via Franklin, LA)
Offline
Sean has a habit of calling timeouts way too prematurely. However, I can't remember a case where it cost us as classically as this one. I'll start with what I believe he was going for: He wanted to get the ball back in Brees's hands with as much time as possible.

The problem is that he was calling timeouts in situations that it was very unclear that the defense would make a stop. The first timeout was before the two minute warning after a first down 2-yard loss. Sure, 2nd and 12 is a pretty good spot to be in, but there was very little to gain by blowing a timeout to save 15 seconds. The worst part of this is that he's taking the pressure off the Giants offense. Now, instead of having to work the balance of running out clock and making sure they have time to get into scoring position, they just had to run their offense.

The second timeout wasn't any better. It came on a two-yard run on 1st and 10. So, 2nd down and we're trying to stop the clock. I just don't get it. I don't have a problem calling timeouts on 3rd down and taking a shot at getting the stop and getting off the field, but too much can happen after 2nd down to know that calling a timeout was a good thing.

We see the result. Burned all three timeouts, and allowed the Giants to take a knee and try the field goal. This is a recurring time management problem of Payton's, and I don't recall a game where it's worked out in his favor.
 

Hopeless

All-Pro
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
1,269
Reaction score
1,960
Offline
You guys are wild. That was absolutely the right usage of the timeout. Youre trusting your d to not give up a new set of downs. If they do, the game becomes much much harder to win, even with the extra timeout.

Lots of reasons to be upset today. This not being one of them.
 

crosswatt

Gone Fishing.
Staff member
Administrator
VIP Contributor
Joined
Jul 10, 2001
Messages
32,282
Reaction score
46,065
Location
Chesapeake, VA
Offline
You guys are wild. That was absolutely the right usage of the timeout. Youre trusting your d to not give up a new set of downs. If they do, the game becomes much much harder to win, even with the extra timeout.

Lots of reasons to be upset today. This not being one of them.
Made sense to me, but what do I know?
 

bclemms

More than 15K posts served!
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
33,581
Reaction score
44,082
Age
13
Location
Jackson, ms
Offline
You dont call a timeout after first down with 2:15 remaining. Its just dumb. You trade that 15 seconds to make sure the team doesnt pick up thevfirst on 2nd down so you can still stop the clock even if they pick up the first. Should seem like common sense.
 

0rion

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
7,562
Reaction score
12,582
Location
Central Ohio
Offline
barring a turnover that game was essentially over at that point.....we needed something huge there. TO is a moot point.
 

Saint Droopy

Born/Raised in Hollygrove
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
May 29, 2006
Messages
26,424
Reaction score
18,683
Location
Reppin' N.O. here in DFW
Offline
Payton looks like a genius if Crawley simply knocks the ball away rather than try to catch the INT.

Time is precious. Those 15 secs may have cost us a shot at scoring. I don't have a problem with the timeout.
 
OP
Saint Kamara

Saint Kamara

Formerly SaintSproles and SaintReggie
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
38,767
Reaction score
51,592
Age
56
Location
Austin, TX
Offline
You guys are wild. That was absolutely the right usage of the timeout. Youre trusting your d to not give up a new set of downs. If they do, the game becomes much much harder to win, even with the extra timeout.

Lots of reasons to be upset today. This not being one of them.
Just wow
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)



New Orleans Saints Twitter Feed

Headlines

Top Bottom