Offline
You've got to admit, DD, that hetero marriages often happen sans children. Two 80-year-olds aren't in the reproduction game anymore, but they get the same benefits you and I do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You've got to admit, DD, that hetero marriages often happen sans children. Two 80-year-olds aren't in the reproduction game anymore, but they get the same benefits you and I do.
Sure, nothing is perfect.
But, I think if you go back and read some of the reasonings and discussions behind the adoption of the current set of laws and tax codes, you'll find quite a bit of impassioned arguments which relate the legislation directly to providing relief to the cost burden of families and parents.
Which are also modeled on a way of life that is happening less and less frequently, A male wage earner and a female slave, I mean homemaker. Time to update things and get with the times. Freedom of religion was pretty much a fundamental building block of this country but that hasn't stopped much of the Christian Right from updating that to Freedom of Religion for the majority or those that believe like I do. :dunno:
Civil unions are fine by me. Then, let the state jurisdictions get to decide what's what.
See, to me, you're expanding the very definition of the term "marriage" when you include same-sex unions under that word. Moreover, same sex unions usually do not bear the additional costs associated with a marriage.
Granting same-sex couples the exact same breaks which were given to married heterosexuals because of children is giving away something for nothing, other than political correctness, in my view.
Daughter #2 is married, she's Son-in-law #1's problem now, not mine!