Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Of course he should. He probably is. And the Saints are probably negotiating it.
None of this has to (nor should) occur in public.
What's the hurry? The season is not over and free agency period (ie. the new calendar year) isn't until March.
The only vocal issues have come during the Grant negoiations and I think that says a lot about him as a man. But he can now feed his children.
This deal will get done.
I do to. It says that when Loomis admittedly made a low ball BS offer, Grant was man enough to laugh in his face. He then went about his business and played hard enough to get the fair deal he got after last season. It takes a man to stand up to the man and get what you're due. A sissy little girl with an inferiority complex is the type who would have caved. Good call!
Colston is an exculsive rights free agent. Unless he threatens to sit out - which would hurt him more than the Saints - his agent cant demand a big contract. He just has no levarage.
Yes he does deserve a new contract and yes he should get it. He is gettiong paid 7th round money (which I am pretty sure is league minium) And he is playing better than most 1st rounders....
So after Charles Grant underachieved this season, I guess that makes Loomis an idiot for trying to get him a cheaper price. We over paid for Grant and you can't put up a single shred of proff to prove that is not true. He is overpaid. In hindsight, we would have been better off letting him go. Just my humble opinion.
Colston is free to insist on a new contract as soon as the final; whistle sounded after the Bears game.
"My client demands...a shrubbery!"
Loomis: O Knights of Ni, you are just and fair, and we will return with aNo, he definitely should not be demanding a NEE contract! No one deserves that kind of stuff.