Shouldn't we go OT in the 1st round? (1 Viewer)

[bleedit1960]

Some late round OTs we could look at.

hokiesports.com :: Football :: Vinston Painter Really like this guy. Can not believe he ran a 4.74 in the 40 at 6-6 309. I would have to see that.

Rutgers Football - #76&nbspR.J.&nbspDill

hokiesports.com :: Football :: Nick Becton Yes another V.T. tackle.

Oscar Johnson Profile - Louisiana Tech Official Athletic Site I think he might be as good or better than Jordan Mills.

Joe Caprioglio Profile - Colorado State University Official Athletic Site

 

[Dart]

It's about the value of the spot you're picking, what prospects are available? You don't reach for a tackle who has bottom of the 1st value while passing on a top 5 pick who dropped into your laps. There is NO WAY taking the likely tackles who will be available seems logical to me. There will be an overload of talent at 15 to choose from with greater value.

But that's my point. Your current "Top 5" "Top 15" "bottom of the 1st". It's all imaginary. First rounders flame out or underperform ALL the time. Just because Mel Kiper (or whoever, not picking on Mel) doesn't mean he'll be better than a kid he doesn't like. For us it's all about who the Saints like and the "Top 5" will be the first 5 players picked! You won't be able to assess the value of those picks for years. As I said, I'd rather we gave the scouting staff and Front Office the benefit of the doubt.