Since it was an interception, it should have been unnecessary roughness (1 Viewer)

[ItFan]

I’m talking about the reception by Cook that led to the interception. Since it was ruled an interception rather than a fumble, it’s logically impossible not to throw a flag for unnecessary roughness. Cook was hit from his blind side (also with a helmet to helmet). An because they ruled he didn’t have possession of the ball, he was a defenseless receiver.

 

[SweetT]

I thought it should have been hitting a defenseless receiver, but I guess I was wrong.

 

[ItFan]

He was

 

[PXSaber]

Any LA Refs or St Louis Refe?
Maybe the entire crew? ?

 

[SweetT]

He was

That’s what I thought