DSnfla
ALL-MADDEN TEAM
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2005
- Messages
- 8,262
- Reaction score
- 10,765
Offline
I'm not saying that Rat didn't look better in the Wash game. But,on Rat's 1st drive there was a FS flag that made it 3rd and 11 and he threw his best pass as a Saint to MVS that actually caught it. Then it was Wilson throwing the TD pass.I mean, the same things happened to Rattler, including a large number of dropped passes, and he still played much better than Haener. Heaner just looked lost and Rattler looked like he belonged. And considering Rattler was a rookie and Haener had a year in the NFL already, I think that's pretty telling about their futures.
Maybe Haener gets better and Rattler doesn't. And maybe Haener ends up passing up Rattler this year, but at this point it's pretty clear that Rattler is far ahead of Haener and Haener has a year more experience in the NFL.
2nd possession, 3rd and 10 Rat takes a sack and was bailed out by a D holding drive extending flag . Also on that drive he get's a rough the passer call to further aid in the drive , a drive that Miller was the best part of.
3rd drive, He gets another roughing call , but he did throw a very good pass to Foster so it didn't really matter. On this drive Rat had a almost sure pick dropped.
Last drive , It was almost all Miller, Rat threw a couple good passes including the TD but Miller really got them there,
Rat did not have any dropped passes had flags helping his drives, had Wilson throwing 1 of the TD passes. AND the OL played WAY better 2nd half.
I'm not saying Rat played bad I'm saying what if Haener had the same advantages Rat had , no drops , drive extending flags , Miller running the ball well, much better OL play. Go look at that game and you'll see these things