- Joined
- Aug 29, 2006
- Messages
- 10,707
- Reaction score
- 10,516
Offline
my grandfather is full blood coushatta. he's got no problem with it. redskin simply does not compare to wetback or the nword or any other racial slur, because it IS NOT A SLUR. It is considered offensive because of how it was used to describe scalps. Europeans did not invent the term, nor did they invent scalping, and any team named the redskins doesn't parade around a mascot dressed like a scalp. It is unfortunate the term brings up negative "memories" for a select few, but the same can be said of many terms, like crusaders, slave, jew, catholic, democrat, republican, liberal. The point is that it is the person hearing the term who is attaching a negative connotation to a word whose meaning is anything but. And this can be done with any word, and you can probably find a small group who are offended by any term used to describe a group.
"Redskin" is a racial descriptor for Native Americans and one of the color metaphors for race used in North America and Europe since European colonization of America.....The term was once in common use, as evidenced in Western movies, but is now largely considered a pejorative.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redskin_(slang)
An often mentioned third but not proven origin involves the bloody skins (red-skins) of Native people as "prizes," in which they would be scalped after battle and their skins bought and sold in local towns.[3]. To date there is no historical documentation or evidence to support this theory.