tomwaits
Frontier Psychiatrist
Offline
So 2 gamers were feuding over Call of Duty and one called the police and said there was a hostage situation at the other guys house. Problem is, the address that the first guy told the police was not the second guy, but some innocent random person.
Police show up, fear for their lives and the usual happens.
Police will not be charged, but the guy who called them is being charged with manslaughter.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...d-in-swatting-death-of-kansas-man/?comments=1
One of the comments on this news story made me think.
Police show up, fear for their lives and the usual happens.
Police will not be charged, but the guy who called them is being charged with manslaughter.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...d-in-swatting-death-of-kansas-man/?comments=1
One of the comments on this news story made me think.
A cop in the US shows up at a random dudes house and murders him in cold blood in a non-stressful, non-escalated situation (there was clearly no hostages on site). The cop is not responsible, but the person who made the call is being changed with involuntary manslater.
Easy to miss in this ****** ****** of suck is this: For charge to hold, the court needs to be show that "The defendant knew or should have known his or her conduct was a threat to the lives of others."
in other words, the state (in going ahead with the case) is ready, willing and they believe able to proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that any US citizen should know that calling the cops on someone is very likely to lead to them being killed.