oodank
BIG DOG!
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2003
- Messages
- 2,370
- Reaction score
- 1,999
Offline
I hear a lot of us saying "he'd be a good fit, but not at #10." If we need what he's offering, why not at #10? If we drafted LB Conner, or LB Lofton, or even CBs Mckelvin or Jenkins at #10 why would that be too high? The only difference would be the amount of money, right? Well, somebody's gotta get the #10 money. Why not a guy we think is going to be the best at the position we need the most help at.
If we all think LB is our biggest need, don't wait: get the best LB at #10. If its CB, then draft him at #10. Just because the perception is "you cant draft that guy that high because you can't pay him #10 money" I don't buy into that.
How many of us REALLY believe DT is our #1 need? Probably not half of us. But we'll probably draft one if Ellis falls because it'll be said he is better than the best CB, or LB. And we need more help at CB and LB??? I'm just taking a simplified approach to filling needs, thats all. This is always an arguable topic to me....
If we all think LB is our biggest need, don't wait: get the best LB at #10. If its CB, then draft him at #10. Just because the perception is "you cant draft that guy that high because you can't pay him #10 money" I don't buy into that.
How many of us REALLY believe DT is our #1 need? Probably not half of us. But we'll probably draft one if Ellis falls because it'll be said he is better than the best CB, or LB. And we need more help at CB and LB??? I'm just taking a simplified approach to filling needs, thats all. This is always an arguable topic to me....