CountWhoDat
Pro-Bowler
Offline
I am not sure how this statute fits the crime either. My choice would be negligent homicide, but that also depends on the language of the statute. For me I don't see where she has criminal intent, that is, I don't think she intended to commit a crime. But someone can be so negligent to the point they are criminally negligent, which is negligent homicide when it results in death.
As a prosecutor, that's the offense I think I could best sell to the jury in this case. Even if she believed he was going for a gun, I would argue that belief was not a reasonable belief under the circumstances. I tend to believe she did think she was in danger, but that her use of deadly force was excessive if the facts are as they appear on the video.
Yeah I think you're on point with that. Oddly, I don't think Oklahoma has a negligent homicide statute, or at least not a separate one. It looks like any homicide without general intent falls under their second degree manslaughter statute, which looks like this:
Every killing of one human being by the act, procurement or culpable negligence of another, which, under the provisions of this chapter, is not murder, nor manslaughter in the first degree, nor excusable nor justifiable homicide, is manslaughter in the second degree.
OSCN Found Document:Second Degree Manslaughter
So, it seems this essentially this functions as their negligent homicide statute, among other things. What's odd is it seems this is the perfect fit for the officer's actions that night. I do wonder whether or not they overcharged her hoping for the lesser included offense or perhaps the sound of "second degree manslaughter" to the non-legal ear sounded questionable or not serious enough. I'm honestly not sure.
There's also a justified deadly force statute specifically for officers, but I don't want to wade into the weeds on that tonight.