- Joined
- Jul 18, 1998
- Messages
- 22,117
- Reaction score
- 45,438
Online
I don’t know the details of the case, so I don’t have much of an opinion.
I do know the 12 million was because there was negligence involved that the legal council for the department felt would lead to a monetary settlement, so they made a deal. However, negligence isn’t necessarily criminal negligence. The jury believed the negligence didn’t rise to the level of criminal.
Once again, I’m not saying agree or disagree. I don’t understand the case well enough to have an opinion.
i could buy that if it was a one million settlement - then i could buy the argument that it was a 'throw some money at it to make it go away' situation
But not 12
If there was enough negligence to justify a 12 million dollar payout there HAD to be some criminal negligence too