Offline
Can you elaborate on what you believe is wrong? Is it that the AG didn't present the case to the grand jury as a murder case? I've never actually sat on a grand jury, so I'm not sure how that works. Does the AG typically suggest charges?This is wrong on so many levels. And now the AG is trying to delay the release of the recordings and transcripts. Two justice systems, folks...
Kentucky AG didn't seek murder charges in Breonna Taylor case | CNN
Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron Tuesday night suggested the grand jury in the Breonna Taylor case could have made an "assessment about different charges," in an exclusive on-camera interview with CNN affiliate WDRB.www.cnn.comKentucky attorney general given until Friday to release grand jury recordings in Breonna Taylor case | CNN
The release of grand jury recordings in the Breonna Taylor case will be delayed until noon Friday, according to a judge's order.www.cnn.com
I read the second story and it says the AG wanted to delay the release in order to redact individual witness' personal information in order to protect those witnesses.
I see no issue with that. It's still going to be released, which is highly unusual, as the article states. Was there something specific in the delay that you see as wrong or are you suggesting the AG has an ulterior motive? I'm not sure what that would be since he's still required to release it. Another few days isn't really going to change anything.Cameron's office said in a statement earlier Wednesday that the recording is more than 20 hours long and it needed "additional time ... to redact personally identifiable information of witnesses, including addresses and phone numbers."
Last edited: