Offline
That's like asking why it's good to have an open mind. If I'm on trial, I don't want someone judging my fate just from what they immediately see. I want them to be open to different perspectives. I may think the evidence is obvious, but that doesn't mean that I will immediately side or believe every single thing the prosecution says.So whats the point of debating something when its "overwhelmingly obvious"?
Im not following the logic here. Challenge what beliefs? what our own eyes and hearts see in the evidence?
Can you expand on what this challenge/question ourselves does for a person?