- Joined
- Jul 13, 2001
- Messages
- 475
- Reaction score
- 575
Offline
This and the guy that gave you a clown rating needs to look in a mirror and he will see a clown.You still don't get it... No one is saying Brees never had a bad game, a bad 2 games, or a bad 3 games... He did... They were few and far between. He was consistently one of best and most reliably great QBs in the NFL for over a decade... If he played 10 games, he was going to be great in 8 of them. If the defense let us down, it was expected that he would save us. If you left him 48 seconds on the clock and no timeouts... You expect he's going to dive us down for the win.
JW is the opposite of that... He's never been consistently great... or even good. If he strings together 5 great games in 10, It's an outlier in his 8 year career... It's not bias, It's not a double standard... It's a fact.
You can be critical of both guys, but one guys' standard for criticism is nowhere near the level of the other.... This is not that hard... We can be critical of some games that Mahommes, Brady, and Rodgers have played... but they have far and away been great 5 times more than they have been bad (same for Brees)... So the level of criticism should account for that accordingly... QBs like JW have not earned that leeway, and hence the criticism and level of leeway will not be on the level of a guy that has proven to be consistently great.
Not seeing this is blind fanboy homerism at best...
EDIT: And if JW is injury is effecting his play to the point where he can't be a moderately consistent starting QB... He should sit.