Offline
Your pov is certainly legit - but it pre-supposes a clunky silver bullet approach and it also presupposes that we’d try to eliminate itSociety is not ready to have a conversation about critical design flaws that are ever so present that are woven into the destruction that falls under the darker side of human nature. Such conversations, if we're going to have an honest discussion devoid of agenda's and focus strictly on the human being as such is going to be a very uncomfortable conversation where certain realities are going to inevitably rear its ugly head about how destructive we are as a species.
So while mainstream society reiterates old boring and tired talking points looking for the big bad boogieman that is neatly packaged with whatever preferred narrative that helps them sleep at night, people who know the truth of this reality understands that this is a problem that is unfixable and will forever be bogged down in the politics surrounding the access of mass killing potential of certain weapons.
As for the racial aspect of this particular incident, I.E blatant hateful ideology that leads one to racist thoughts to the point where someone blamed the ills of society on two groups of people, blacks and jews, the only question I have is, can you remove extreme biases from human beings? I say its impossible and is never going to happen. Racism is an extreme bias against a group of people on the basis of race, biases exist in every day society from minor, choosing where to eat for the day, vs
extreme I.E, hating someone based on religion, sexual orientation, gender and race, etc.
We've decided as a society to attempt to educate, showing why these behaviors are unacceptable and have tried to mitigate these extreme biases by creating social consequences of having such thoughts. If someone hates another group of people based on any of the criteria that makes up another human being, aka, certain characteristics, we shame the heck out of them, cancel them, fire them, run them out on a rail, so to speak. However, does that really fix the problem? All that really has accomplished is making what was once very public become very private, the hatred of said people just festers outside of the view of the public eye. Despite all the attempts to educate and mitigate, it still rears its ugly face, time and time again because in reality, you cannot legislate human bias from the human being, no matter how minor or extreme it is, in this case we're only talking about extreme biases against groups of people on the basis of said criteria.
Hypothetically speaking, lets say, tomorrow, 4chan is banned from the internet and the reasoning is that its a hub for hate, it is stated that these imageboards are too dangerous for people to access them because of(insert your reasoning here) there would be multiple new sources to replace them in literal hours of their banning, only this time it would be more underground and out of the public eye. You didn't change anything, you effectively made things much worse, what was once public now becomes the underbelly and nothing changes in the end.
The attempt of exterminating entire groups of people is nothing new, its been a feature of human beings since the dawn of man. I bet if we had better historians, we would find such extreme biases similar to racism playing out in the days of cavemen where certain cavemen either hated the way other cavemen looked or hated whatever early rituals they adopted and killed them based on that.
While I think we can do better to mitigate access to mass kill weapons to mentally deranged people and doing a better job of watching people who exhibit the stereotypical warning signs that these mass shooters all seem to share, we will never eradicate extreme biases from human beings. While some people think this is a bug in the human condition, I say its a feature that has existed since the dawn of man.
No matter how much you educate and attempt to mitigate, you're always gonna have those who fall through the cracks and carry out these terrorist attacks.
Because we don’t have a cure for cancer doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t develop better medicines or live healthier to try and avoid cancer