I BELIEVE
Guest
Offline
I say give them a 3rd , and Reggie Bush for Dorsey.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So...we've established
1...Dorsey is a bust (I'm not buying this one...)
2...there is no way he's coming to the saints (I'd agree)
So...where does he go?
If I were a GM of a playoff caliber team, I'd consider trading a 1st for him. He deserved being picked at #5, so to trade a #22 or higher...I'd say good deal. Unless of course, he could be had for cheaper...
He's young, healthy (i think), and has tons of potential. I don't believe he's a bellyup fat cat (Johnathon Sullivan...errr...he who shall not be named).
So...where does he go?
So...we've established
1...Dorsey is a bust (I'm not buying this one...)
2...there is no way he's coming to the saints (I'd agree)
So...where does he go?
If I were a GM of a playoff caliber team, I'd consider trading a 1st for him. He deserved being picked at #5, so to trade a #22 or higher...I'd say good deal. Unless of course, he could be had for cheaper...
He's young, healthy (i think), and has tons of potential. I don't believe he's a bellyup fat cat (Johnathon Sullivan...errr...he who shall not be named).
So...where does he go?
Well, several things.
1. I don't think he's a bust. I even think he's an ok player. But that doesn't gurantee he'll be a great player. A lack of success for a bad franchise doesn't gurantee success with a good franchise. So giving up a 1st or even 2nd rounder for him seems fool hardy to me. He may of deserved to be picked at #5 at the time but so have dozens of other players picked high who didn't work out. Past draft status doesn't replicate current value.
Part of me tends to think he could come here and play very well though. I'd try to score him cheap though b/c his value has went down since he was drafted.
2. You say he's not like Sullivan but he did show up to camp this past season well out of shape and was sat out of TC for a while until physically cleared. Take it for what it's worth.
We are thin at DT... we're so thin that we're playing a DE (Hargrove) at DT. Clancey has an injury that doesn't seem to want to heal (or is he back this week?), and I can't see why adding GD would be such a bad thing.
He's a 3-tech, but he looks to have gained a few since arriving at KC, and he's played the NT spot in the past.
Why do people keep saying that we'd "mess things up" by bringing him in? Worst-case senario... he could spell Ayodele until he's fully acclaimated, and even if he doesn't crack the starting lineup this year he can go into camp next year and try to earn the starting spot.
All the guy would be doing is coming in and slide into the rotation. Clancey is 30-something... we'll eventually need to replace him, and why not replace him with a bonafied stud? Forget what he hasn't done at KC. Some guys need a change of scenery, and bring GD home would do wonders for him.
I wasn't a fan of the move when I started the thread, but the more I think about it... the more I think he'd fit here. Him and Sed anchoring our D-line for years to come... man that would be sick.
Worst-case senario... he could spell Ayodele until he's fully acclaimated, and even if he doesn't crack the starting lineup this year he can go into camp next year and try to earn the starting spot.
Clancey is 30-something... we'll eventually need to replace him, and why not replace him with a bonafied stud?
reggie for dorsey..... reggie for dorsey..... reggie for dorsey.... CLAP,CLAP,CLAP....
reggie for dorsey..... reggie for dorsey..... reggie for dorsey.... CLAP,CLAP,CLAP....