- Joined
- Jan 22, 2000
- Messages
- 26,224
- Reaction score
- 14,226
Offline
You just said if I/we don't accept them into these spaces, it means I/we want them to die.
No, immediately after I presented why I think allowing trans girls to compete as girls in youth sports, and why I didn't believe it hurt cis girls, your reply was that you were inspired to do the opposite of what I was saying and that trans kids committing suicide was not your problem. You didn't say that I was wrong in it helping trans youth. You didn't say I was wrong in it not hurting cis girls. You just said you were inspired to do exactly what I said would make it harder for trans girls to mature into healthy responsible adults. Again, directly said what my concern is and why you said you were inspired to do the opposite (ie, make it harder for trans girls to find acceptance - that is the opposite of what I was seeking). You provide no alternatives or countering facts or figures
To which I responded you'd rather see a trans kid die as long as none of them get a girl trophy. Is that wrong? Is that not your stance?
Basically scenario 1 - trans girls have complete acceptance in all aspects of youth life. Trans girls win 3% of the trophies. 12% of trans girls attempt suicide. 50% of those suicides are successful.
Scenario 2 - trans girls do not have complete acceptance. Cis girls win 100% of the trophies. 20% of trans girls attempt suicide and 50% are successful (current rate)
I understood you to say that scenario 2 is better than scenario 1. Is that not correct or incomplete? Because I've asked over and over again to show me how having trans girls compete harms cis girls, and the only thing you've said is you just a "real" girl to win. Nothing to do with their mental health or the values of competitive sports. Just so long as they get their shiny trophy.