bclemms
More than 15K posts served!
Offline
Yeah, I think the GFS is better than most give it credit for but the Euro is the better model. The GFS really tends to struggle with low development from Yucatan to Belize. I think there will be a storm, maybe 2 in the gulf, just not sold on either solution at this point.Cooler farther north in the GOM. But the uncertainties on any possible track, or another system forming, are primarily due to the fact there is no well defined center and other factors to still play out. Once a well defined center has formed, there will be better guidance on what will become of the Cristobal and any other possible system to develop.
And not to debate the accuracy of the GFS vs the EURO model, because they both have their own challenges with systems, depending on timing. But here is a pretty good write up, in Forbes discussing the two.
Euro Vs. GFS: The Weather Model Wars Take A New Turn In March
A new U.S. weather model goes operational in March. Does it challenge the European Model (and does that even matter)?www.forbes.com