- Banned
- #16
brophy
Very Banned
Offline
okay......he cussed.........but what about his CONTENT? Did the dude have a point or not?
What kids are listening to that show?
What kids are listening to that show?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
okay......he cussed.........but what about his CONTENT? Did the dude have a point or not?
What kids are listening to that show?
I'm no expert on the situation, but I side with Robert Smith. Turley is very passionate about the issue, but I think he's expecting that the NFL owes all former players who got "hurt" a decent living for the rest of their life. He misunderstands what "disability" actually is. "Disability" doesn't just mean you have injuries that prevent you from playing football. It means you can't work, period.
Robert Smith has a much more balanced view in that the players (especially in the modern era) need to take more responsibility for their own financial planning and future career path. Yes, there are some former players who are disabled from working (not just playing football) who aren't getting a fair shake, but this doesn't encompass all former players who ever suffered a career-ending injury.
The point Turley is making is the same one most of us are trying to avoid. The fact is the problem affects more people than we publicly hear about and the NFL doesn't want to deal with it. Robert Smith needs to understand that there would be no "modern players" without those now suffering while these "modern players" get paid more for one game than many of them made for a season....or a career. Robert Smith, I echo Kyle Turley's sentiments.