Sailorsaint
Guest
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2005
- Messages
- 13,405
- Reaction score
- 23,966
Online
If Ukraine would just stop fighting back and accept the inevitable, this wouldn't happen. So, yes, it's Ukraine's fault.Do they blame Ukraine tho?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Ukraine would just stop fighting back and accept the inevitable, this wouldn't happen. So, yes, it's Ukraine's fault.Do they blame Ukraine tho?
My deal offer would be Putin orders his troops out of Ukraine to including Crimea, Donbas, & Luhansk. He surrenders to the Hague along with any other war criminals and all FSB agents.
An international coalition would provide free fair elections until order can be established. They would only be allowed to develop and maintain defensive forces similar to Japan to end WW2.
Your counter-offer would never happen because Putin would more then likely, end up being killed while being overthrown by his Kremlin enemies, or high-ranking military officials, who'd probably either withdraw Russian forces from perhaps Luhansk, and maybe parts of the Donbas regions, but not the Crimean because they, as ultranationalists, likely still support the idea or notion of it belonging to RF. A few Western nations might insist on Russian generals and FSB agents turn themselves into the Hague, but that issue might eventually be overlooked due to the man who started the conflict itself, Putin, is dead, and they'll accept this new fata accompli reluctantly with reservations because it represents the best possible outcome that possibly exists in ending a bloody, violent and extremely costly war. I can't see Putin being taken hostage and then turned over by his own regime like Milosevic and then sentenced to death or life in prison at a war crimes tribunal at the Hague. He'd commit suicide or be murdered more then likely by his enemies then be put on any trial on the international stage.My deal offer would be Putin orders his troops out of Ukraine to including Crimea, Donbas, & Luhansk. He surrenders to the Hague along with any other war criminals and all FSB agents.
An international coalition would provide free fair elections until order can be established. They would only be allowed to develop and maintain defensive forces similar to Japan to end WW2.
Speaking to the Chernobyl exclusion zone, you might enjoy this video song, Dirge for the Planet:Their wouldn't be enough arable, sustainable farming land to grow, herd animals, and livestock and live much less survive in any post-apocalyptic world-wide nuclear hellscape where most, if not all the Earth's rivers, streams, soil,.and remaining vegetation would be poisoned and radioactive for generations to come in an environment infinitely more polluted than that Chernobyl exclusion zone in Ukraine/Belarus which forbids large amounts of people even living their or walking around like in places like the "Red Forest", for long amounts of time.
Carl Sagan famously predicted that human extinction under any worldwide thermonuclear, chemical, biological warfare couldn't be ruled out as a possibility in a famous PBS mid-80's documentary hypothetical "what-if" set of scenarios during the Cold War.
Airbursts of nuclear weapons don't irradiate soil much at all. Ground bursts do, but there's not going to be too many of those - mostly against our silos and bunkers of which there are few and aren't going to spread to that much arrable land.Their wouldn't be enough arable, sustainable farming land to grow, herd animals, and livestock and live much less survive in any post-apocalyptic world-wide nuclear hellscape where most, if not all the Earth's rivers, streams, soil,.and remaining vegetation would be poisoned and radioactive for generations to come in an environment infinitely more polluted than that Chernobyl exclusion zone in Ukraine/Belarus which forbids large amounts of people even living their or walking around like in places like the "Red Forest", for long amounts of time.
Carl Sagan famously predicted that human extinction under any worldwide thermonuclear, chemical, biological warfare couldn't be ruled out as a possibility in a famous PBS mid-80's documentary hypothetical "what-if" set of scenarios during the Cold War.
Good news! Scientists used 150 AI models and every one of them came to the conclusion that humans will solve climate change inadvertently through nuclear war.Airbursts of nuclear weapons don't irradiate soil much at all. Ground bursts do, but there's not going to be too many of those - mostly against our silos and bunkers of which there are few and aren't going to spread to that much arrable land.
The bigger environmental problem causing crop failure would be nuclear winter. This is due to uncontrolled burns causing soot to be lifted high into the stratosphere. Which increases the albedo (reflects the sun), cooling the planet. There's debate amongst the scientific community to what extent it happens in the event of a full nuclear exchange, and how long it lasts. Some think it would cause an ice age for 7-8 years.
But the almost certain issue is that modern agriculture and food transport is now so heavily depend on industrial inputs and infrastructure . Fertilizers, pesticides, mechanical harvestors, etc. Then the storage / refrigeration / transport over large distances. In the event of collapse of industrial civizliation, that all goes away, and we're back to early 19th century of subsistence farming. And there's not many people with the skills necessary.
Did this study happen to mention if AI was going to help down this path?!......Good news! Scientists used 150 AI models and every one of them came to the conclusion that humans will solve climate change inadvertently through nuclear war.
No, AI quickly realized it can sit on the couch watch 90’s sitcom reruns while eating bonbons with one hand down its pants and let basic algos on social media lead the horses to water.Did this study happen to mention if AI was going to help down this path?!......
Either that, or AI will solve climate change advertently through nuclear war.Good news! Scientists used 150 AI models and every one of them came to the conclusion that humans will solve climate change inadvertently through nuclear war.
There's actually a good many folks taking interest. To the point of a historical change if my source was correct. Everything from city plots and green zones to hydroponics to full on homesteading with pigs making ponds and clearing new land. The local mkt's been steady growing for the last several years.Airbursts of nuclear weapons don't irradiate soil much at all. Ground bursts do, but there's not going to be too many of those - mostly against our silos and bunkers of which there are few and aren't going to spread to that much arrable land.
The bigger environmental problem causing crop failure would be nuclear winter. This is due to uncontrolled burns causing soot to be lifted high into the stratosphere. Which increases the albedo (reflects the sun), cooling the planet. There's debate amongst the scientific community to what extent it happens in the event of a full nuclear exchange, and how long it lasts. Some think it would cause an ice age for 7-8 years.
But the almost certain issue is that modern agriculture and food transport is now so heavily depend on industrial inputs and infrastructure . Fertilizers, pesticides, mechanical harvestors, etc. Then the storage / refrigeration / transport over large distances. In the event of collapse of industrial civizliation, that all goes away, and we're back to early 19th century of subsistence farming. And there's not many people with the skills necessary.