- Moderator
- #13,891
Online
After 24 hours I caught up by reading 10 new pages of this thread. What I found dismaying is the few number of tweets which have been posted which I found credible.
As I recall there was one tweet by Mark Hertling amoung that mess and that was about it:
I found Kiwi's posts credible and interesting, however his posts are limited to what he is seeing and hearing in a limited location.
What I saw in the last ten pages of this thread was a ton of speculation and unconfirmed reports. Very little that I would use to form an impression about the mobilization with the goal being to have an insight toward what might happen next.
Mark Hertliing has a PHD in Military Science. I only hold a minor degree in Military Science, and a bachelor degree in Physics. I highly respect anything Hertling has to says. This thread by Hertling is as far as I'm concerned is the gold standard on the topic of Russia's hapless mobilization:
If you don't read anything else, read this. Hertling knows what he's talking about. He's the expert on Twitter.
This is the list of the other people on Twitter I also find credible:
I love Hertling's stuff. Gold standard indeed.
While I agree it's hard to sort fact from fiction during fast changing events like this, I do think we still need to post what people are saying and seeing. I'd rather us continue keeping the information flowing as some people don't have or use Twitter and other social media sites.
Your points are well taken though.