Offline
I think some of the reaction to donato's comments are interesting.
There is a prevailing notion in this country and throughout much of the western industrialized world that things are evidence of success. It is essentially what keeps the economy going. More than that, the push for having everything in your individual house is largely what keeps the 1% at the 1% level.
Community laundries, including laundries at school are one of the many enemies of the 1%. that is why there must be a lot of social pressure to make you think that being respectable, non-loser, etc. requires your own personal laundry machine in your house to be used by 2, 3, or 4 people as opposed to a community wash that might have 1 machine for every 150 people or something.
And of course, god forbid if you didn't even need a machine at all to do your laundry - the horror!
and we should have more community gardens
i look forward to the convergence of autonomous cars and ride sharing
i think libraries can expand into loaning out tools and digital equipment
there are MANY ways we can live more communally - go to a 32 hour/week schedule so there is time to do that
i agree that we do not have to use material possession as our mark of worth
HOWEVER
as a response to the issue at hand - dirty clothes encouraging absenteeism - washing machines at schools are EXCELLENT things
and your points are for a 'down the road' disscussion