What is John Claytons problem??? (1 Viewer)

Hopeful

Pro-Bowler
VIP Contributor
Joined
Aug 17, 2001
Messages
617
Reaction score
725
Age
64
Location
Kennesaw, GA
Offline
First he predicts the Saints would lose seven in a row, now he says ATL and Carolina are the two best teams in the NFC South ...on paper????



10. Carolina Panthers at Atlanta Falcons (Dec. 24): On paper, these are the two best teams in the NFC South. Michael Vick has already given the Panthers' defense trouble. The Panthers spent three years acquiring defensive players to stop him. They added speed at the corners to contain him in the pocket. Vick caught the Panthers cold in the opener with a 20-6 victory in Charlotte. Most of the division races will be formalities by Christmas. This one should still be undecided.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Saint James

Hall-of-Famer
VIP Contributor
Joined
Aug 12, 2001
Messages
3,752
Reaction score
454
Age
38
Offline
In his defense...he did say "on paper"...which normally implies "should be"...

not that I am really trying to defend John Clayton.
 

billinms

Tiptoeing Through the Tulips
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
19,659
Reaction score
24,583
Age
50
Location
Ocean Springs
Offline
Drugs are bad Mr. Clayton...mmmkay?
 

Attachments

  • mr.mackey.jpg
    mr.mackey.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 342

mdharper

Subscribing Member
VIP Subscribing Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2002
Messages
5,540
Reaction score
3,096
Location
Central Texas
Offline
Yup he also said the Saints "could" lose 10 games in a row, not would, which is really saying nothing at all because it's true of all teams.
 

Redfish

© Geaux Saints!
VIP Contributor
Joined
Nov 2, 2000
Messages
7,819
Reaction score
1,151
Location
the 601
Offline
Should I just go a head and plan others things for my Sundays now?
 

Ti Rider

Me Worry?
Joined
Feb 6, 2002
Messages
17,368
Reaction score
9,975
Location
My couch
Offline
Clayton and Salisbury are both saying now the Saints will be lucky to be a wildcard team. There's lots of factors why neither like the Saints. The biggest has to be that the team is making them look like idiots with their preseason predictions. IIRC both precdicted the Saints to be 6-10 or worse (didn't Clayton say the Saints would be lucky to win 4 games?) and easily the worst team in the NFC South. So both keep predicting a long losing streak for the Saints. Well, Haslett's Saints would have happily complied, I get the feeling that Payton's Saints are going to continue to make these two "experts" look like idiots......
 

Big Lob

Veteran Starter
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
553
Reaction score
289
Offline
Well, who cares really?

All that matters right now is beating the Steelers.

Let the experts talk.
 

Hedon James

VIP Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 1997
Messages
2,543
Reaction score
3,471
Location
Garden of Hedon
Offline
First he predicts the Saints would lose seven in a row, now he says ATL and Carolina are the two best teams in the NFC South ...on paper????



10. Carolina Panthers at Atlanta Falcons (Dec. 24): On paper, these are the two best teams in the NFC South. Michael Vick has already given the Panthers' defense trouble. The Panthers spent three years acquiring defensive players to stop him. They added speed at the corners to contain him in the pocket. Vick caught the Panthers cold in the opener with a 20-6 victory in Charlotte. Most of the division races will be formalities by Christmas. This one should still be undecided.


Unfortunately for him, and all the other "paper prognosticators, the games are played ON THE FIELD........not on paper. Accordingly, those paper predictions are a waste of the paper they're printed on.

All that said, try to cut John a little slack. Have you seen him lately? He's a very sickly looking boy... Perhaps that may explain his bouts of delirium?!
 

St. Pike

Representing Proudly
Joined
Jul 10, 2001
Messages
2,794
Reaction score
1,282
Age
52
Location
Tirane, Albania
Offline
Unfortunately for him, and all the other "paper prognosticators, the games are played ON THE FIELD........not on paper. Accordingly, those paper predictions are a waste of the paper they're printed on.

All that said, try to cut John a little slack. Have you seen him lately? He's a very sickly looking boy... Perhaps that may explain his bouts of delirium?!


All predictions are based on past performances. In sports, they correlate it with draft picks, who they think will contribute immediately, and free agents acquisitions.

The problems: young players may improve, coaches can learn, older players can decline, and average players can out perform, as well as, under perform. Sometimes, they even predict who will do the above for the next year. A supposition based on a supposition.

As someone noted, no one likes to be wrong. Losing to the Ravens like we did, only gave a breathe of new life that they won't be wrong.

Another problem is people give them far toomuch credit for their opinion. A sportswriter has no more the observation skills than I possessed. A former player can draw upon his own experiences, but he still only observing. There is no reason to get all hyped up when they say great or bad things about any team. Think about it, how often do you wonder if you are watching the same game as the "analyst?"
 

tristang

Banned
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
1,701
Reaction score
0
Offline
All Analysts at one point or another have backed the saints. Some more, some less.

John Clayton is the ONLY one, that I am aware of, that has CONTINUALLY dismissed the Saints as a real team.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

New Orleans Saints Twitter Feed

 

Headlines

Top Bottom