anything offensive... i dont care if its o-line (although i'd be a little more forgiving depending who's on the board), ANYthing on the offensive side of the ball would upset me
As big of a DOOOOCE supporter that I am, I don't think Mend would be a bad pickup (but I don't expect that to happen anyway). I would be more upset if we got DRC. I just don't think he's worth #10.
I would say any offensive pick would disgust me, but looking back that is the wrong approach.
If we went defense in 2005, we would of never got Jamal Brown, and not one good defensive player was picked after him in the first. I just wish they instead had the "mancrush" on Shawn Merriman, because I did.
I think Balmer would be a super-enormous reach at #10...if we picked somewhere around 22-25 I would be happy with him, but at #10? nee chance as the Glaswegians would say
I picked Balmer, but honestly...Rivers doesn't impress me enough for the 10th pick either...I want DRC respectfully, but I feel like that's truthfully the only player other than McKelvin I'd want us to pick at #10....If we are targeting anyone else (with the exception of Ellis or Dorsey falling to #10), I'll be the first to say we should trade down if nobody else has....so in conclusion the only picks I'd be happy about at #10 are: DRC, McKelvin, Dorsey, Ellis....
You can get a solid Linebacker in the 2nd, but the best Corners will be gone by the 2nd round...I really think even Flowers will be gone before our pick in the 2nd...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.