What's better? (1 Viewer)

BlackNGoldblood

Cruisin' for a Bruisin'
VIP Contributor
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
5,365
Reaction score
3,894
Age
46
Offline
For a team like the Ravens to achieve a 9-2 record with a plus-15 turnover ratio? Or for a team like the Saints to be 7-4 despite a minus-9 turnover ratio?
I say it can go both ways. You never want your team to get into a habit of turning the ball over and not forcing turnovers. However, it says plenty about your team to have one of the worst TO ratios, but still one of the better records in the league. Maybe the Saints, for example, could be due for a change in that stat and thus become even more tougher to beat.
 

whyhuh3

Veteran
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Age
35
Offline
if they wouldve never turned the ball over we would be undefeated,but we turned the ball over alot in those games we lost hence we lost.i think that in the four games we lost we averaged turning the ball over 3 times if im not mistaken...panthers 1....ravens 4.....bengals i think 4.....and the steelers 3.just seems when we play bad we play very bad and when we play good we play very good
 

kfran

TwoDat! Let's Do It Again
VIP Subscribing Member
VIP Contributor
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
8,226
Reaction score
5,180
Location
Irving, Texas via NOLA
Offline
For a team like the Ravens to achieve a 9-2 record with a plus-15 turnover ratio? Or for a team like the Saints to be 7-4 despite a minus-9 turnover ratio?
I say it can go both ways. You never want your team to get into a habit of turning the ball over and not forcing turnovers. However, it says plenty about your team to have one of the worst TO ratios, but still one of the better records in the league. Maybe the Saints, for example, could be due for a change in that stat and thus become even more tougher to beat.
In the case of the Saints, it's easy to see how turnovers were directly responsible for losses. That's correctable as evidenced by the Atlanta game.

However, when I also know that the reason the Ravens are on the plus side is because of that stout D, I'm a little torn. Can we just take their D with our O for the last 8 games?
 

jlam

Do you not?
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
3,523
Reaction score
355
Age
36
Location
:beltbuckle:
Offline
In the case of the Saints, it's easy to see how turnovers were directly responsible for losses. That's correctable as evidenced by the Atlanta game.

However, when I also know that the reason the Ravens are on the plus side is because of that stout D, I'm a little torn. Can we just take their D with our O for the last 8 games?
Hmm....8 games huh? So we're either not getting a bye and losing in the NFC Championship game, or getting the bye and.............:rock:
 
OP
BlackNGoldblood

BlackNGoldblood

Cruisin' for a Bruisin'
VIP Contributor
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
5,365
Reaction score
3,894
Age
46
Offline
Well ra, you make a good point. I wasn't really comparing records, though. I was just comparing any two teams with good records but with totally opposite turnover ratio stats. The Ravens and Saints were just an example.
 

jlam

Do you not?
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
3,523
Reaction score
355
Age
36
Location
:beltbuckle:
Offline
Name the last team that won a Super Bowl without a top 10 defense.
Hmmm...my guess would be that you briefly researched this before posing the question and the answer is not obvious.

My first guess would have to be........2000 Ravens.











Kidding. My first guess would be the 99 Rams, but that's off the top of my head.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Similar threads



Headlines

Top Bottom