st.randy
otis
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2005
- Messages
- 8,076
- Reaction score
- 1,291
- Age
- 57
Offline
This began with the below post
This prompted this reply from me
Then multiple people commented on the above post
So clearly at this point the reasons for Haslett's failure after 2000 (and why one can suppose Payton will succeed where Haslett failed) is part of the discussion. 3 people are talking about it including the thread starter. You even tangentally mention it
You also said Blake was on a "Brees like tangent" which, I guess, if by "like tangent" you mean 82 QB rating to 98 QB rating, 2,000 yards to 3,500, 0 straight 300 yard games to 5 straight.
Then someone else directly addresses my post on the topic of Haslett's success/lack thereof after 2000 and why
So I directly address him
Where we finally arrive at your "confusion"
So, while you may have only been strictly comparing the 2000 to 2006 season we see 4 seperate people involved in a tangental off-shoot discussing why Haslett failed after 2000 but many of us suspect Payton will succeed.
You're welcome to join the discussion if you so choose, now that i've caught you up on everything.
You're so kind.....but in consideration to the people who actually want to debate the actual topic, based on the fact that it is the actual topic, I would like to have the ability to do so. I apologize if I offended. But I do see the validity in the original discussion, and wonder how one can even consider the future of Paytons decisions when they obviously have yet to happen.
While you so diligently took the time to do all of that editing....I am not so near sighted that I can't seee where the topic was derailed. I do have the right to continue on the original topic as I obviously find it very relevent.
BTW calling it "confusion" tells me that perhaps it isn't I who is confused. I was actually trying to reel this thing back in a be a part of a good discussion.
Last edited: