ilvdsnts
Pro-Bowler
Offline
I believe in him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I guess that we just have differing opinions on terminology. Initially you said that he was "very good". I disagree. A very good player is a guy who is a pro bowl caliber player. Davenport hasn't been a pro bowl caliber player. Now you are saying "pretty good". I completely agree with that terminology. He's solid-to-good when healthy. But "very good"? I think of guys like Demario Davis and Marshon Lattimore as "very good"...and I just don't think that Davenport is on that level (even when healthy). Cam Jordan is exception/elite, and Davenport is not even close to that tier of production.
That's a high bar. Lattimore is better than very good. He's elite. Lattimore is one of three players on the team that you could make a legitimate argument that they are the best at their position in football (Ram, CGM). Davis is right on the cusp of elite. I'd say "very good" would be in the top 25-30% of players at your position, "Pretty good" is basically above average.
Healthy Davenport was better than "above average" last year. He was an excellent, or very good player. And he's only going to get better.
I can’t help but say that IMO, Davis was the best LB in the NFL in 2019-20.I believe in Davenport, When he is on the field he is a force and disrupts plays pretty consistently. His play has not been poor, but his availability has been. When he plays a full season there is no doubt in my mind he will be one of the elite DE's in the league.
That's a high bar. Lattimore is better than very good. He's elite. Lattimore is one of three players on the team that you could make a legitimate argument that they are the best at their position in football (Ram, CGM). Davis is right on the cusp of elite. I'd say "very good" would be in the top 25-30% of players at your position, "Pretty good" is basically above average.
Healthy Davenport was better than "above average" last year. He was an excellent, or very good player. And he's only going to get better.
He's been more reliable and constent than Davenport.Lattimore has not been elite since his rookie season. He is not even close to best in the league right now.
Lattimore has not been elite since his rookie season. He is not even close to best in the league right now.
There are a lot of Saints fans who don't know much about football that say a lot of dumb things like "he's regressed omg!" after they watched him put up generational, unsustainable stats his rookie year and "regressed" from an 8-10 game stretch of "the best defensive player to ever play football" type numbers to "top 2-3 CB in the league" type numbers.
You, and they, will just need to watch more football. He is one of the best, if not the best CB in football. We can revisit this again when he's a free agent, if you'd like to be wrong even more.
He is not the best CB in football, he is not top 3 either. In the first half of 2018 he was not good. Then he recovered and was good for the rest of the year. Last year he was good too, but he was never top 2-3 like in his rookie year. Never. His overall pff grade from last year shows that too.
yeah, he's regressed. OMG!
Maybe his god-like grades in his rookie season are skewing his grades over the last three years. I don't know.
There are a lot of Saints fans that cannot see besides their bias towards the team and say dumb things like "There are a lot of Saints fans who don't know much about football that say a lot of dumb things like 'he's regressed omg!' ". But someone with the absolute minimum of brain cells and mental health to be honest with themselves can see he is very good, probably top 10 in the league, but not top 3 until. Not right now.
You, and they, should try to take care of your insecurities and be more honest about things in life, including the team you are a fan of.
PFF breaks down the film from every play of all who qualify at their position, and based on the data of those reports, they rank the players.
In the post above you they rank man coverage results of qualifying CB’s from 2017-2019 and Latt grades 2nd.
What’s your system and grading system? Why should we believe it over PFF? Honest questions.
Yes, I agree with that. Lattimore is a very good player, just not top three/elite. Davenport on the other hand has a lot of talent, is good already, but is not in that very good level yet.He's been more reliable and constent than Davenport.
I think most of us see it. His first he started to flash and then he had some type of turf toe that took a few weeks to get back in the groove. Last year was similar except this time he was gone for the year. In terms of Latt, jackpot. He migh not be the best but he has a chance to be the best CB we ever drafted, no corner is perfect and teams still avoid him.Yes, I agree with that. Lattimore is a very good player, just not top three/elite. Davenport on the other hand has a lot of talent, is good already, but is not in that very good level yet.
Also, I think some of the blame for Lattimore not being elite since his rookie years is on our defensive coached with bad defensive scheme at times.
PFF breaks down the film from every play of all who qualify at their position, and based on the data of those reports, they rank the players.
In the post above you they rank man coverage results of qualifying CB’s from 2017-2019 and Latt grades 2nd.
What’s your system and grading system? Why should we believe it over PFF? Honest questions.