LAhotsauce
ALL-MADDEN TEAM
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2014
- Messages
- 4,141
- Reaction score
- 7,013
Online
If sports survived the 60s why would it be destroyed now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I hear people say this (losing fans because of the anthem protest in 17) but the NFL is still the big dog compared to MLB and the NBA. If they did lose fans, the impact was minimal.Actually, it did make a dent. The league has lost a lot of fans. But, that's not all related the the social justice stuff. Some of it can be attributed to the poor product on the field. The issues with the refs, among other things.
True, but a lot of people like Boomer Esiason and others don't approve of sports and politics intertwined.
No, not ok, boomerOK Boomer
I would agree with you except for a little word that actually changes things quite a bitPosted this in another forum, but I think it fits. A lot of people see sports as a distraction or escape from life's trials and tribulations. The more social issues and politics creep into sports, the less of an escape it is for them and the less enjoyment they get out of it. Pour on top of that, from a football perspective, all the turmoil related to the game with referees and punishments etc. I can't blame people for just throwing in the towel. Lives are already a mess right now and they really need a break from it. If sports no longer provides that for them then why watch? I wouldn't blame or ridicule anyone for stepping away right now. I'm not there yet, but I totally understand.
Use it, see it. However you want to say it, it's still the same. It doesn't necessarily mean they're mad about it. If someone needs a distraction and their source of distraction becomes another source of consternation then it makes sense for them to lose interest in that sport. It doesn't necessarily have to do with a specific event or issue, but a culmination of events could certainly lead to a tipping point.I would agree with you except for a little word that actually changes things quite a bit
they don’t ‘see’ sports as a distraction, they USE it as a distraction
sports is sports
how we see it is what we bring to it - it says everything about us and nothing really about sports
fans could easily shut out social media and only tune in for games, except why don’t they?
heres what I think is happening- people know they are on the wrong side of this. They know the protests are legit, but they don’t LIKE it. They don’t have the arguments to backup their dislike so they seek shelter behind symbols. And it makes them angry that the better arguments force them to be defensive
Jack Johnson, Jesse Owens, Jackie Robinson, John Carlos, Tommie Smith, Mohammed Ali, Althea Gibson, Bill Russell, etc etc etc. they know they were on the wrong side of each and every one of these
i contend they’re not mad at the players but mad at themselves
Anyway, Malcolm Jenkins said it best when he said politics/protests aren't a part of the actual game. They take up two minutes before the game.