Would you take tainted Super Bowls?

Suspicious Championships or none at all?

  • Everyone cheats. Give me the Super Bowls

    Votes: 44 44.0%
  • No way. Better clean than winners

    Votes: 56 56.0%

  • Total voters
    100

Bill

Still Leaking Gold
Joined
Jan 22, 2000
Messages
31,467
Ratings
16,037
Online
I'll take our few legit wins over Patriot-style wins any day!

And if any of our past wins have come about by cheating... I wouldn't want 'em either.
 

Jackavelli

Sarang Upso
Joined
Jul 8, 2001
Messages
12,186
Ratings
3,413
Location
International
Offline
i'm not gonna question anyone's inner beliefs on cheating, but if I hear someone say they do not want a Saints SB if the Saints tape another team; I would have a hard time thinking they are a Saints Fan.
 
Banned #7
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
402
Offline
Umm....

I don't care

we've been in the league for a looong time with only 2 playoff wins

we're the most pathetic team in the NFL

give me a ring
 

baarbogast

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Messages
4,050
Ratings
1,623
Age
53
Online
I want the rings, there hasn';t been any proof the Pats cheated so their wins aren't tainted. I want evidence not just someone saying they supposedly did something during a walkthrough.
 
Banned #10

marccooper

ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Messages
1,594
Ratings
1,328
Location
USA
Offline
Our current regime is tainted with staff who cannot identify the next Wes Welker (we made a trade with Miami too, for Mare), get production out of vets like Seau who people thought was finished, turn a middle round pick into an Asante Samuel, scrap together top secondaries out of middle round picks altogether, get production out of a cocky player like Randy Moss, etc. I would rather a regime that maybe cheated a little than a regime that lacks the coaching and talent evaluation ability, particularly on the defensive side of the ball, to make cheating worth the effort. We need to view Belichick as a model, not discount his success.
 

Bill

Still Leaking Gold
Joined
Jan 22, 2000
Messages
31,467
Ratings
16,037
Online
I want the rings, there hasn';t been any proof the Pats cheated so their wins aren't tainted. I want evidence not just someone saying they supposedly did something during a walkthrough.
What a mean, cruel new league commissioner we have now who would fine a coach and pull a first round pick for unsubstantiated rules violations.

:dunno: /sarcasm off
 
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
1,421
Ratings
42
Age
29
Location
Pleasant Hill
Offline
By "same old Saints," does that mean we'd never win one, or we'd have to work hard and maybe we'd eventually get one? If I knew there was no other way, I'd take the tainted titles, but if there was even a shred of hope that we could still win it all the right way, I'd say don't cheat.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
175
Ratings
44
Age
41
Location
Bonaire, GA
Offline
If the Pats cheated, they will get their due eventually. What goes around comes around, I truely believe that.

In the end, your good name is all you have. You can loose your job/house, friends, etc, but once folks can't trust you, you have truely lost everything.

Just my opinion.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Similar threads




Saints Headlines (The Advocate)

Headlines

Top Bottom