Wow... Every media outlet predicting us to lose by 10+ at home. (1 Viewer)

[VDK]

no, it's because we have no guards... u still dont get it.

Did you watch the game?

 

[shaihulud]

16 red thumbs on my post and yet I feel vindicated....

 

[LiterOCola]

QB: Saints
RB: Saints
WR: Saints
OL: Raiders
DL: Raiders
LB: Raiders
CB: Raiders
DB: Saints

If I were to look at that and not know the teams, I'd generally pick the team representing Oakland to win. The Raiders are going to have the advanage in controlling the line of scrimmage, which generally leads to a win. If the Raiders had a worse QB, I'd say it's too close to call, but Carr (while not a superstar) is efficient and careful with the football.

Two red thumbs, but the only thing I was wrong about is the Saints having better running backs. Vaccaro saves the DB column from becoming a toss up.

 

[El Caliente]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Based on ESPN&#8217;s win prob. model, Raiders had 51% chance to win if they kicked PAT &amp; 44% chance if they went for 2 <a href="https://t.co/2FNbZxRwzj">https://t.co/2FNbZxRwzj</a></p>&mdash; ESPN Stats &amp; Info (@ESPNStatsInfo) <a href="https://twitter.com/ESPNStatsInfo/status/775083321349009408">September 11, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

To bad Jack didn't take ESPN's advice.