But not only did he NOT weight it to seize the new record, he then filleted and (presumably) ate that sucker? No thanks, I'll stick to eating specks and reds.
That's a pretty cool story, they should have disabled comments for that article though......I agree that we should leave the big females to reproduce, but a gar? I am sure there are many more big ones than we have seen or heard about.....that said, CHOOT 'EM BRENT!!!!!
Dat rascal is bigger than the 'Ssippi record caught a couple years back by accident in a net, I'm pretty sure. Come to think of it I'm not so sure. I think I know the website it was posted in though, it had a fishing section. as I recall the other fish was weighed and was a record weight, but the net excluded it from the book. "I think".
Look, I'm new here. Are you allowed to ask a question about the forum in a thread like this? Tanx.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.