Offline
allegedly
That’s all any of this is, allegations.. for you to say that ‘one side’ or the other side has the moral high ground right now, at 3:14pm Central on Sep 27th, with only what we know now, is preposterous.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
allegedly
Wwl/entercom is the defendant here. Innocent until proven guilty.
This tweet, by itself is not enough to get paid. Seth has to prove that they intended to offend him and that they created an environment that allowed this to happen. Intent is important.
Now we know that Wwl is evidently ready to show that the tweet was sent by Seth himself. He now has to be able to counter that to convince laymen who will be ignorant about the technology that it’s more believable that someone at wwl sent it. He’ll have to counter evidence that they are not a hostile environment. Wwl will have plenty of defense for that.
It won’t be easy for seth.
Frankly, I find it very hard to believe that anyone at wwl would be so stupid as to send this tweet. It is either a rogue or it’s seth.
^ Not actual legal analysis
I know you want that to be the case, as do a lot of people on here.
Your first post in the thread seemed to pick a sideYou can say that all you want, but it doesnt make it true.
I’ll repeat for the third time in this thread- i’d never heard of Seth Dunlap before this story broke, and I haven’t listened to WWL in years.. i have no dog in this fight.. i’m not sure if YOU would like to see it proven that Dunlap sent the tweet himself, or not- i dont want to speak for you.. but you seem to have no problem stating that a lot of people here want to root for “a side”.. i’d just like to know the truth about what really happened.
Freakin’ WWL... this seems like par for the course for them.
I cant imagine too many people have access to send tweets from their official WWL Twitter account.. Whoever did it probably thought it was a joke, but this is 2019 for chrissakes.. Talk about creating a hostile work environment for this guy.
You can say that all you want, but it doesnt make it true.
I’ll repeat for the third time in this thread- i’d never heard of Seth Dunlap before this story broke, and I haven’t listened to WWL in years.. i have no dog in this fight.. i’m not sure if YOU would like to see it proven that Dunlap sent the tweet himself, or not- i dont want to speak for you.. but you seem to have no problem stating that a lot of people here want to root for “a side”.. i’d just like to know the truth about what really happened.
Your first post in the thread seemed to pick a side
Seems to me that if what is being accused by wwl, seth should be arrested.If Entercom is not 99.9999% sure or more then they took a big risk going public with their accusations.
They may have done so, though.
I mean, he hasn;t been arrested.
Seems to me that if what is being accused by wwl, seth should be arrested.
#FreeInternetLegal
He would have to be very stupid and by all accounts, he's not.
I don't know how stupid he is, or isn't.............but, at minimum, he (allegedly) was misguided enough to feel he deserved 1.8 million because he got called a *** on the Internet. Which puts him in good company with pretty much anybody who ever attended a public school or spent more than about a day in chatrooms during the 2000s.
At 3:59, Scoot said he couldn’t comment, and he had backed Seth earlier in the week, but he said “ it didn’t look good for Seth”.That’s all any of this is, allegations.. for you to say that ‘one side’ or the other side has the moral high ground right now, at 3:14pm Central on Sep 27th, with only what we know now, is preposterous.