Head Coach if there is no GM change

That's not what the OP said. you are correct, it's right there...read the post. you heard what you wanted to hear so you could rebut. And "digging a whole" was a reference to ML, not you, so not sure why you feel that was directed at you. if that was your perception, I apologize....I feel I was clearly referencing ML in a paragraph about ML. I perceive that you have moved the focus from your dismissive and condescending attitude back to the original post. you're too busy defending yourself and your opinions to even consider what's being said to you.

others have pointed it out, I have pointed out, the owner of the forum has pointed it out....and you keep justifying and defending yourself. Consider what I said in prior post....if you're the common element in multiple issues, perhaps the common element is the problem. You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but it's not what you say, it's how you say it. See it...don't see it...but when multiple posters are telling you the SAME thing, over and over, you might want to spend more time to consider what's being said, and less time doubling-down on your position. We're trying to help you here.....good luck.

Explain to me exactly what it is I am misinterpreting with the OP. The English looks clear to me and the beef here has been more so about my initial reply being taken as disrespect and an outright insult equated to harsh insulting words, not my interpretation or feelings about his post.

Multiple posters may be telling me one thing (most of whom are strongly on the fire Loomis side and fight tooth and nail with anyone that says otherwise, which hurts that argument IMO), and there are multiple posters agreeing with my post by evidence of the likes, including at least one from a moderator. Doesn’t make either side right. It’s a discussion board.

Like I said though, it’s clear to me that my words are going to be characterized a certain type of way that’s different from other posters I have seen, and I will adjust accordingly.