NFL Draft Giants open to trading one of their picks (1 Viewer)

[DerrickB]

I have to ask, Yes or No? Lol

 

[ELLIASJWILLIAMS]

Nahh, it's a weak QB draft meaning some of these guys are going to get overdrafted. I'd also like to see Winston not have competition or know he's a place holder for at least 1 year. Build the offense around him this year and either sink or swim with him. Then if need be, throw your hand in the QB sweepstakes in next years draft.

If you sink you'll have a better spot in the draft and you'll likely get some picks for the Sean Payton trade which will give you some ammunition without having to overdo it.

 

[No2DC]

Very weak QB class.

 

[livefromDC]

I'm hoping that nobody goes nuclear stupid and starts drafting QBs in the first half of the draft. I'd very much prefer if teams just went full stupid (like usual) and start drafting these QBs in the latter half of the draft. Would love for someone to jump from the low to mid 20s to 18 for a QB who has no business being drafted in the first.

 

[Jesse Custer]

Weak QB class. If we trade up, I want it to be for a receiver. Whether Winston is the answer or not, the team needs offensive weapons.

 

[Eman5805]

I don't accept this as a weak class so no individual QB is worth having.

People are repeating what everyone else is saying. Combined with yeah, there's no obvious franchise guy with great production, pedigree, and/or physical talent. But there are guys with two of the three and I've seen guys like that become long term starters and even franchise guys.

If we want a guy, go get him. You aren't drafting a QB class. You're drafting Desmond Ridder or Kenny Pickett, or whomever.

 

[livefromDC]

I don't accept this as a weak class so no individual QB is worth having.

People are repeating what everyone else is saying. Combined with yeah, there's no obvious franchise guy with great production, pedigree, and/or physical talent. But there are guys with two of the three and I've seen guys like that become long term starters and even franchise guys.

Says some starry eyed GM every year with school girl fantasies of turning the bad boy into Prince Charming, "everyone is wrong about him" LOL.

 

[Stew 2.0]

Maybe for a stud LT I’d do it

 

[jahsoul357]

I don't necessarily agree with that either, but it's pretty much common consensus that other positions are being graded higher as a class. It doesn't mean there are no good QBs in the draft. It could be an opportunity for a team that is drafting late due to previous trades or overperforming without a great QB to get one a bit later than normal. The Colts need one and don't have a pick in the first, they could trade up. We could draft one at 18 or even trade back into the back end of the first for one.

Picking up Matt Ryan gives them a chance to wait a year to see how next year panned out. They will probably be picked up by teams that see value or potential but it doesn't feel like anyone is viewing any of these QBs as a "must have" this go around like they are projecting for next year.

 

[MV2]

I don't accept this as a weak class so no individual QB is worth having.

People are repeating what everyone else is saying. Combined with yeah, there's no obvious franchise guy with great production, pedigree, and/or physical talent. But there are guys with two of the three and I've seen guys like that become long term starters and even franchise guys.

If we want a guy, go get him. You aren't drafting a QB class. You're drafting Desmond Ridder or Kenny Pickett, or whomever.

I agree. When was Drew & Brady drafted? Didn't Rogers fall? Point being, these dudes are more wrong than right. Kinda like the weatherman. Hell Baker went #1 overall and even though he's available teams aren't trading for him. They'd rather wait until he's cut and take their chances. That says alot.

Most of the biggest busts are QBs and many don't get drafted where their NFL production should have landed them. No way Mahomes doesn't go #1 now for example. So I take these "experts" opinions with a lump of salt.

 

[sammymvpknight]

I don't accept this as a weak class so no individual QB is worth having.

People are repeating what everyone else is saying. Combined with yeah, there's no obvious franchise guy with great production, pedigree, and/or physical talent. But there are guys with two of the three and I've seen guys like that become long term starters and even franchise guys.

If we want a guy, go get him. You aren't drafting a QB class. You're drafting Desmond Ridder or Kenny Pickett, or whomever.

Completely agree. How was Brees’s draft class? Brady’s? There will always be guys who play better than expected…those are the guys you almost have to find as a team rarely picking in the top 5.

 

[livefromDC]

I agree. When was Drew & Brady drafted? Didn't Rogers fall? Point being, these dudes are more wrong than right. Kinda like the weatherman. Hell Baker went #1 overall and even though he's available teams aren't trading for him. They'd rather wait until he's cut and take their chances. That says alot.

Most of the biggest busts are QBs and many don't get drafted where their NFL production should have landed them. No way Mahomes doesn't go #1 now for example. So I take these "experts" opinions with a lump of salt.

Then take a QB in the second like Brees or the 6th like Brady.

Thats not what any of you are proposing.