NFL Stadiums & Climate Change (1 Viewer)

Optimus Prime

Subscribing Member
VIP Subscribing Member
VIP Contributor
Joined
Jul 18, 1998
Messages
24,981
Reaction score
53,960
Online
NFL stadiums across the country could take a major financial blow due to climate change.

A new report from Climate X, a climate risk analytics company, estimates that NFL stadiums could experience up to $11 billion in cumulative climate-related losses by the year 2050. This could mean higher insurance and repair costs, impacts to local economies, and disruptions in the league.

Among the 30 stadiums that were evaluated, some were identified as more vulnerable to 11 natural hazards like flooding, wildfires, extreme heat, and storm surge.

New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium is the most vulnerable, and is projected to incur a total loss of $5.64 billion. This is largely due to its exposure to storm surge and surface flooding. The loss the stadium could sustain is also greater than its estimated replacement cost.

“MetLife Stadium in New Jersey is one venue, in particular, that we’ve projected could sustain pretty severe losses in the future. And the hazards that we identified as large instigators of that damage are surface flooding and storm surge,” Austin Clack, a solution engineer, at Climate X, told The Independent on Friday.

“And so, with that knowledge, you can then move on to choosing certain adaptation measures that might reduce that risk.”

Adaptation measures like setting up better drainage and floodwalls can have a substantial impacts on the losses a venue could sustain.

In California, the Los Angeles Rams’ SoFi Stadium – the most expensive NFL stadium ever constructed – could suffer losses of $4.38 billion primarily due to surface flooding risks.……

 
That title is pretty misleading. Seems to always be the case though. Article seems to be saying that the biggest risk is due to landscape being so predomnately paved that ground no longer has surface area to absorb water. That is not climate, that is just due to our construction methods.
 
I believe that Sofi was built below surface level because it was in the flight line for LAX….crazy to hear of this threat now.
 
That title is pretty misleading. Seems to always be the case though. Article seems to be saying that the biggest risk is due to landscape being so predomnately paved that ground no longer has surface area to absorb water. That is not climate, that is just due to our construction methods.
Also, by the by, when in geological history was the climate NOT changing?
 
NFL stadiums across the country could take a major financial blow due to climate change.

A new report from Climate X, a climate risk analytics company, estimates that NFL stadiums could experience up to $11 billion in cumulative climate-related losses by the year 2050. This could mean higher insurance and repair costs, impacts to local economies, and disruptions in the league.

Among the 30 stadiums that were evaluated, some were identified as more vulnerable to 11 natural hazards like flooding, wildfires, extreme heat, and storm surge.

New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium is the most vulnerable, and is projected to incur a total loss of $5.64 billion. This is largely due to its exposure to storm surge and surface flooding. The loss the stadium could sustain is also greater than its estimated replacement cost.

“MetLife Stadium in New Jersey is one venue, in particular, that we’ve projected could sustain pretty severe losses in the future. And the hazards that we identified as large instigators of that damage are surface flooding and storm surge,” Austin Clack, a solution engineer, at Climate X, told The Independent on Friday.

“And so, with that knowledge, you can then move on to choosing certain adaptation measures that might reduce that risk.”

Adaptation measures like setting up better drainage and floodwalls can have a substantial impacts on the losses a venue could sustain.

In California, the Los Angeles Rams’ SoFi Stadium – the most expensive NFL stadium ever constructed – could suffer losses of $4.38 billion primarily due to surface flooding risks.……

They can just get this ....

 
Also, by the by, when in geological history was the climate NOT changing?
Never ever ever in human history! If you believe in the big bang that was a climate event of sorts. continents have shifted, that's climate. Ice ages, dry ages and all between.

The more trees we cut down not for wood because we replant that but for urban development we in trouble.
 
That title is pretty misleading. Seems to always be the case though. Article seems to be saying that the biggest risk is due to landscape being so predomnately paved that ground no longer has surface area to absorb water. That is not climate, that is just due to our construction methods.
Sure, but construction methods can certainly affect the local ecology conditions, no?
 
MetLife is at greatest risk? They must be using some dollar value adjustment, because the Superdome isn't even mentioned. Neither is Hard Rock, Raymond James, NRG, nor EverBank.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom