Photoshop to get new image 'Unblur' tool (1 Viewer)

TheDeparted

VIP Contributor
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
22,246
Reaction score
33,568
Location
--
Offline
Michael J. Fox can start taking photos again! Check this out...

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xxjiQoTp864" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Source
 
Wait.. CSI has been doing this for years.. are you telling me that CSI isn't real??? :hihi:

That's freakin tight
 
Well, that means I've deleted thousands of pretty good photographs over the years....
 
SO now we can see what all those blurry big foot pictures really are.

:nono:
Mitch Hedberg said:
I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. Run, he's fuzzy, get out of here.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiqkclCJsZs&feature=player_detailpage
KiqkclCJsZs
KiqkclCJsZs
 
I should probably mention that the utility really only corrects images that are motion-blurred (are otherwise in-focus), and not focus-blurred. Or whatever the correct terminology is.
 
Michael J. Fox can start taking photos again! Check this out...

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xxjiQoTp864" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Source

It doesn't appear to be able to unblur a pixelated image. Now THAT would be a big deal. Sounds pretty cool though.
 
It doesn't appear to be able to unblur a pixelated image. Now THAT would be a big deal. Sounds pretty cool though.

A pixelated image is low-res, so it's missing information. Any solution would be a guess at best...perhaps using a fractal algorithm.
 
I see this technology being a standard built in camera feature in five years or less.
 
A pixelated image is low-res, so it's missing information. Any solution would be a guess at best...perhaps using a fractal algorithm.

Yup. That's why it would be really impressive if it could someday do that.
 
It looks like they use point spread function deconvolution methods similar to Topaz InFocus which produces fancy demos and less fancy, though sometimes useful, real world results. While it won't be a replacement for proper technique and equipment, hopefully Adobe can do a better job than existing implementations.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom