Should we be interviewing for a GM first? (2 Viewers)

[max]

If you were the owner, what would be your decision.

 

[3ParStillDriver]

You would have to fire Loomis first.

 

[No2DC]

Mick is a made man, the only place he's going is a different part of the building

 

[TribuneUK]

What result are you really expecting when asking the fans of a 5-12 team?

Definition of RHETORICAL

of, relating to, or concerned with rhetoric; employed for rhetorical effect; especially : asked merely for effect with no answer expected; given to rhetoric : grandiloquent… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

 

[Saint Greg]

Well…our GM spot isn’t open at the moment….so no..

 

[sportsaint]

That’s like asking Congress to vote yes for term limits. Mickey ain’t letting that happen. Maybe Gayle would do something. Idk

 

[stadanko]

Based on the original intent of the question, if I were owner, I'd give Loomis one more shot. He's earned that based on his hires before DA. But if this coach hire didn't work out after a few years, I'd be looking for a new GM.

 

[Optimistic Ozzy]

Should you buy auto insurance when you don't have an auto?

 

[Elvis]

It would be very strange to be conducting interviews for a position that isn't even open, so no.

 

[Snakehead]

You wasted a post.

I'd focus on how do we get back to the GM/Coach combo of ML/SP as opposed to the ML/DA duo. I think that would be a MM hire, a strong HC with a winning history and SB Championship.

 

[tim martin]

i know a lot of you want him gone but there’s not a lot out there to choose from based on team interviews i have seen. i’d rather keep loomis and ireland and mueller together which i think is a strong team

 

[Treybad]

If Gayle had to fire DA because Loomis would not.... then Loomis must go....

 

[livefromDC]

You wasted a post.

I'd focus on how do we get back to the GM/Coach combo of ML/SP as opposed to the ML/DA duo. I think that would be a MM hire, a strong HC with a winning history and SB Championship.

You want to get back to what the Saints had when they HIRED Sean Payton, not what they had at the end. Hiring Payton was getting a fresh start with a new coach with innovative ideas who could possibly coach your team for the next 18 years. That's not McCarthy. He didn't come here with a Super Bowl win from over a decade ago. McCarthy today is closer to DA than he is to Payton of 2005.

 

[Rexman100]

We have three of them. I’m sure between the 3 they can figure it out