madsaint1967
Healthy Inactive
Online
At this rate we're gonna give up 68 sacks this year. Russell Wilson was sacked 55 times last year. This will be historically bad!! No end in site for this sackfest that we have.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a testament to how bad our OL is that my thought was "Really? Just 4?"At this rate we're gonna give up 68 sacks this year. Russell Wilson was sacked 55 times last year. This will be historically bad!! No end in site for this sackfest that we have.
Same. It feels like 8. Think that’s because the QB is getting hit about 25 times per game.It's a testament to how bad our OL is that my thought was "Really? Just 4?"
Quit looking this stuff up.I see that 32 teams have given up four sacks per game. Only one had a winning record. We need a solution ASAP.
It's a testament to how bad our OL is that my thought was "Really? Just 4?"
Thunder and Lightning. Kamara/Miller needs to be the answer.I see that 32 teams have given up four sacks per game. Only one had a winning record. We need a solution ASAP.
That number is getting ready to jump drasticallyAt this rate we're gonna give up 68 sacks this year. Russell Wilson was sacked 55 times last year. This will be historically bad!! No end in site for this sackfest that we have.
That number is getting ready to jump drastically
Carr was sacked the same amount of times an injured Winston was last season behind this broken up line. There is nothing pointing to the number of sacks going up with him starting, but honestly, a lot of that is going to be on Sneaky Pete's play calling and scheming.That number is gonna go up with Winston playing QB.
I like Winston, but he holds the ball way too long sometimes.
4 seems like a decent day at the office for that group. I thought 5-6 was the correct answer.It's a testament to how bad our OL is that my thought was "Really? Just 4?"