N/S Pat McCAfee Claims ESPN is trying to Sabotage Him (1 Viewer)

[Saint Floyd]

McAfee is a complete tool who’s schtick has grown old real quick, and he has no business having a national platform on espn or anywhere else, full stop .

He should be working for Vince McMahon full time.

 

[jayd265]

McAfee is a complete tool who’s schtick has grown old real quick, and he has no business having a national platform on espn or anywhere else, full stop .

His show is awesome to me. But he’s def not for everyone. I can see how ppl grow tired of his over exaggerated ways. But I find it entertaining

 

[LonghornSaintsFan]

ESPN where careers outside their worldview go to die.

 

[bigdaddysaints]

ESPN where careers outside their worldview go to die.

as opposed to what other network?

 

[SWJJ]

ESPN parts ways with McAfee Saboteur

 

[Boy_of_wonder75]

ESPN parts ways with McAfee Saboteur

It's a good day to be a meathead.

 

[RaginCajun83]

ESPN parts ways with McAfee Saboteur

Good

 

[SweetT]

ESPN where careers outside their worldview go to die.

Not unless you are a paid Klutch client hyping up LeBron James. Anyone else is expendable

 

[KleinBottle]

ESPN parts ways with McAfee Saboteur

Cannot wait to hear Le Batard on Monday

 

[webster]

ESPN is dead. A lot of the best people who worked there have already gone on and produced their own content. They don’t need the platform anymore…if mcafee is worth as much as they paid him, he wouldnt need them either.

ESPN’s focus on politics instead of sports turned me off. It’s like the late night shows and Hollywood actors. They think since they can pretend to be other people or were once good athletes they know about science or world events. They should stay in their lanes.

 

[Boy_of_wonder75]

ESPN’s focus on politics instead of sports turned me off. It’s like the late night shows and Hollywood actors. They think since they can pretend to be other people or were once good athletes they know about science or world events. They should stay in their lanes.

Can you give us an example of this that turned you off?

 

[webster]

Can you give us an example of this that turned you off?

No. I do t want to get into politics, but many of the show host expound on politics and give their take on subject way outside of sports. It’s ridiculous, just because they were great athletes they now have insight into subjects like science or economics.

 

[STB1]

No. I do t want to get into politics, but many of the show host expound on politics and give their take on subject way outside of sports. It’s ridiculous, just because they were great athletes they now have insight into subjects like science or economics.

And it’s always one sided. If you speak on the other side you get the Steele/Shilling/Brees treatment. But that’s Disney for you.

 

[KleinBottle]

And it’s always one sided. If you speak on the other side you get the Steele/Shilling/Brees treatment. But that’s Disney for you.

So those folks had your personal green light to discuss those topics?

 

[STB1]

So those folks had your personal green light to discuss those topics?

I don’t care what either side discusses but when ESPN blatantly picks a side, how is that fair? Coming from a side that always whines about fair and inclusion and equality? It’s not. Let’s just be honest about it.