N/S Zack Baun: Top Graded LB / DPOY cand. [Why Isn’t Baun Still a Saint Thread] ………. [Eagles re-sign Baun to 3-yr, $51 million contract on March 5, 2025] (4 Viewers)

The specific skillset is apart of Baun’s overall player profile. Baun’s scouting identified him as a college rushing OLB who was better suited to transition to pro off-ball LB than NFL level rusher based on his size and ability. His career has continued to develop into a thriving starting off ball LB, the position he was drafted for, not in the specific skillset of a rusher.

The position that he was drafted to convert to is where he’s thriving in the NFL. Off ball is his better long term skillset. He would’ve been buried or muddled further behind Cam, Trey, Davenport, and Carl if they were intending to make Baun a full time rusher. They’re all complete players as NFL Edges. He had an easier path to playing time and long term starting role as a LB. The goal was to develop Baun into a starting LB amongst Davis, and later Werner, as other LBs, including Werner, emerged or established themselves before he did.

He isn’t the first player who was drafted to play a different position as a pro based on their scouting. Fuaga played RT and Ruiz played C for their entire college careers but were moved to OL positions that were brand new to them. Some players immediately succeed at a new position while others take a few years to develop. Different players’ development pace differently.

Like mentioned before, Baun decided to be a team’s top 2 LB somewhere else. It’s not a bad thing that Baun’s succeeding elsewhere while the Saints had & have their starting LBs.

Besides, Baun was Payton’s pick at the time, not DA’s. The DC has input on the fit. But the selection is still the HC’s decision first. The HC has the initial vision first. That would be like saying some recent offensive or defensive picks not panning out is the fault of Woods or Carmichael.

Smh. Allen basically said he was never getting that chance as a Saint. Allen said they saw him as a special teamer, OLB, and pass rusher. He was not in competition with Davis because in Allen's view they played different positions because of different skill sets. You could just as well argue he didn't get a chance to play safety because the Saints had starting safeties already, smh. The only reason he was ever on the depth chart behind Davis was because LBers who make the team are always listed as depth for the other LB positions.

Zack Baun, while with the New Orleans Saints, was primarily developed as an outside linebacker and edge rusher. I religiously follower Saints camps and practices. Reports from various Saints training camps indicate that he worked in positions geared towards edge and outside linebacker roles. There is no evidence of him being considered for anything else. If someone can produce any evidence that he ever practiced any where inside, I'll relent. But based on my memory, what I've been able to dig through the pass couple days, there's no proof of this argument being made.

If the coach is telling you that you're an OLB/pass rusher and core special teamer, you're never playing MLB for that coach. It wasn't that we already had a starter, it was that there was NEVER going to be a path to MLB in New Orleans as long as Allen was here. I don't understand how you can argue against Allen's own statement on the matter.

nj.com said:
After the Eagles signed Baun as a free agent, NJ Advance Media asked Saints head coach Dennis Allen at the NFL owners meetings where he thought his former player would best fit with his new team.

“Zack’s probably best, we felt like, as an outside backer and an on-the-ball backer,” Allen said. “He’s got some rush ability.”


And true to his word, that's where Baun practiced as a Saint. There's no proof that he was ever considered for MLB role. None.
 
I replied directly with the counter evidence I have, but maybe you didn't see it. Click the quoted text for the important second paragraph.

"We saw someone that we felt was going to be drafted in the top 20 picks of the second round," Saints Coach Sean Payton said. "We felt like this was a player that would be hard for us to get because we didn't have a second-round pick. Fortunately, he came within range and we were able to make a trade.

"He had a lot of production in college as a rush end. He's a guy that we think can play at the Mike position and the Sam position. I do like his pressure traits, but we see him as someone that can play in a stack position if need be or certainly be a guy that can give us some versatility as a rusher."
 
It happens to all teams. The New York Jets let Jonathan Vilma walk. It's not just the Saints.
 
I replied directly with the counter evidence I have, but maybe you didn't see it. Click the quoted text for the important second paragraph.

Yes, that's Coach Payton's words from when he was drafted. No argument there. I won't deny a direct quote. Perhaps if Payton remained the Saints coach, we would have seen that vision play out.

Coach Allen clearly didn't agree after several years of having direct access to Baun. Allen gets bashed unfairly for many things around here. This isn't one of those occasions. That quote is from May of this year. After having Baun in house for years, Allen said, "nah, that guy is a special teamer, OLBer and sometime pash rusher". The Eagles immediately said the same things Payton was saying when he drafted Baun, he can play MLB. Allen said he's an OLB/pass rusher. That's why I'm refuting this idea that he would have ever gotten that shot here because of starters. You can't get the chance to play a position you're not being considered to play.
 
Yes, that's Coach Payton's words from when he was drafted. No argument there. I won't deny a direct quote. Perhaps if Payton remained the Saints coach, we would have seen that vision play out.

Coach Allen clearly didn't agree after several years of having direct access to Baun. Allen gets bashed unfairly for many things around here. This isn't one of those occasions. That quote is from May of this year. After having Baun in house for years, Allen said, "nah, that guy is a special teamer, OLBer and sometime pash rusher". The Eagles immediately said the same things Payton was saying when he drafted Baun.
Yeah, so I think the quotes I gave a couple pages back give a possible sequence of events in line with these quotes/articles, too. My interpretation is a little more positive towards Allen, in that he took an athlete not getting on the field enough as a stack LB and got him into another position. Then his comments related to how they were now using him, while a bit of coach speak avoided the fact he hadn't at that point turned into a stack player that could get on the field.

But I am comfortable we are both able to apply some interpretation to this and neither able to be 100% conclusive. I do think that the SP quote clearly refutes the notion that there was never a consideration of Baun for MLB. Moreover it sounds like that was all part of the plan from the outset.
 
Last edited:
It happens to all teams. The New York Jets let Jonathan Vilma walk. It's not just the Saints.

The Jets were using Vilma correctly and decided to go in another direction. That's one thing. The Giants were using Saquon Barkly correctly and decided to go in another direction because they didn't value the position. The Buffalo Bills did not re-sign cornerback Jabari Greer largely due to financial reasons and chasing high-profile free agents like Terrell Owens. The were using him right though.

These were all huge mistakes made by each respective team's management. Front office strategic errors are one thing. Talent evaluation errors are a completely different and not mistakes you want your defensive minded head coach to make. Allen is a genius when it comes to the secondary, but the errors in the front 7 are hard to overlook.
 
Smh. Allen basically said he was never getting that chance as a Saint. Allen said they saw him as a special teamer, OLB, and pass rusher. He was not in competition with Davis because in Allen's view they played different positions because of different skill sets. You could just as well argue he didn't get a chance to play safety because the Saints had starting safeties already, smh. The only reason he was ever on the depth chart behind Davis was because LBers who make the team are always listed as depth for the other LB positions.

Zack Baun, while with the New Orleans Saints, was primarily developed as an outside linebacker and edge rusher. I religiously follower Saints camps and practices. Reports from various Saints training camps indicate that he worked in positions geared towards edge and outside linebacker roles. There is no evidence of him being considered for anything else. If someone can produce any evidence that he ever practiced any where inside, I'll relent. But based on my memory, what I've been able to dig through the pass couple days, there's no proof of this argument being made.

If the coach is telling you that you're an OLB/pass rusher and core special teamer, you're never playing MLB for that coach. It wasn't that we already had a starter, it was that there was NEVER going to be a path to MLB in New Orleans as long as Allen was here. I don't understand how you can argue against Allen's own statement on the matter.




And true to his word, that's where Baun practiced as a Saint. There's no proof that he was ever considered for MLB role. None.
OH wow there's a lot of false in this lol
 
Yeah, so I think the quotes I gave a couple pages back give a possible sequence of events in line with these quotes/articles, too. My interpretation is a little more positive towards Allen, in that he took an athlete not getting on the field enough as a stack LB and got him into another position. Then his comments related to how they were now using him, while a bit of coach speak avoided the fact he hadn't at that point turned into a stack player that could get on the field.

But I am comfortable we are both able to apply some interpretation to this and neither able to be 100% conclusive. I do think that the SP quote clearly refutes the notion that there was never a consideration of Baun for MLB. Moreover it sounds like that was all part of the plan from the outset.

Can we also agree that it was abandoned? I understand, you're saying it was abandoned because the Saints had a starter. Even if so, Allen would be very shortsighted to stop developing a promising MLB to take over for the starter who turned 32 three years ago. He was literally grooming 2 replacements for Lattimore. If he believed that Baun could be a MLB, which remember his quote from several months ago openly refutes, you'd think he would have been developing Baun to replace Davis. I think, and it's of course my opinion, Baun realized he wasn't in the plans at MLB, not now, not ever. But yes, neither of us can be 100% conclusive although the most recent evidence points to this.
 
The Jets were using Vilma correctly and decided to go in another direction. That's one thing. The Giants were using Saquon Barkly correctly and decided to go in another direction because they didn't value the position. The Buffalo Bills did not re-sign cornerback Jabari Greer largely due to financial reasons and chasing high-profile free agents like Terrell Owens. The were using him right though.

These were all huge mistakes made by each respective team's management. Front office strategic errors are one thing. Talent evaluation errors are a completely different and not mistakes you want your defensive minded head coach to make. Allen is a genius when it comes to the secondary, but the errors in the front 7 are hard to overlook.
I watched Baun in last nights game. He gave up some big yardage plays to Daniels in the first half due to bad reads on his part. Glad to see he's thriving with the Eagles though.
 
I'm glad you showed your work /sarcasm. All I ask is that you support your opinion. I supported mine.
The guy above you supported it, I'm not about to pull up a bunch of data that proves you wrong only for you to dig your heels in lol. It's false and I'll leave it at that.
 
Can we also agree that it was abandoned? I understand, you're saying it was abandoned because the Saints had a starter. Even if so, Allen would be very shortsighted to stop developing a promising MLB to take over for the starter who turned 32 three years ago. He was literally grooming 2 replacements for Lattimore. If he believed that Baun could be a MLB, which remember his quote from several months ago openly refutes, you'd think he would have been developing Baun to replace Davis. I think, and it's of course my opinion, Baun realized he wasn't in the plans at MLB, not now, not ever. But yes, neither of us can be 100% conclusive although the most recent evidence points to this.
I think that abandoned might not be the exact word I'd use, more that they changed course. I suspect he'd still be asked to be ready for stack duties as well, but that's just a suspicion of mine.

I think that you can't groom everyone forever. The DBs you mentioned are ones that haven't reached free agency yet, so the comparison isn't quite timely. Meanwhile, there seems to be the indirect complaint that we paid an All Pro LB (and team leader) top dollar on a long term contract, hoping he'd remain an All Pro team leader and the crime is that... he has?

But I did say back on a very early page in this thread, that there could be a reasonable debate had as to whether the Saints should have gone with the younger option. I think the team hasn't made a bad choice given what Davis continues to do, just that people are unnecessarily caught up in a desire to say 'woulda shoulda coulda' at Allen.
 
The guy above you supported it, I'm not about to pull up a bunch of data that proves you wrong only for you to dig your heels in lol. It's false and I'll leave it at that.

It's not. He pulled an article from when Baun was drafted by the previous head coach. The article I pulled is from May 2024 in which Allen says the Saints now see Baun as being a OLB and pass rusher. You can call it false all day, but it's a direct quote. Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it false.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom