Saints planned to interview Mike McCarthy; McCarthy didn’t garner enough interest from Saints and will take a year off (3 Viewers)

[B4YOU]

Work relationships matter. Rosters can be turned over. Cap can be fixed. But jobs where the HC is the clear Alpha in the building and the owner/organization are committed to winning is rare.

Vrable didn't work in Tenn because of GM/owner. Jets imploded because of owner had to fire HC. Carolina QB Young was drafted by owner and HC fired after 1 yr. Jags GM runs it. Raiders - enough said. Saints job is probably the 3rd/4th best behind the Pats, Bears, and maybe Dallas.

 

[B4YOU]

I'm more intrigued by Kingsbury personally. I think he's learned a lot since his first shot in AZ. But I wouldn't hate McCarthy either.

I think he is a great OC who is probably an average HC. He has a .432 NFL HC record and .467 NCAA record.

 

[DaveXA]

Work relationships matter. Rosters can be turned over. Cap can be fixed. But jobs where the HC is the clear Alpha in the building and the owner/organization are committed to winning is rare.

Vrable didn't work in Tenn because of GM/owner. Jets imploded because of owner had to fire HC. Carolina QB Young was drafted by owner and HC fired after 1 yr. Jags GM runs it. Raiders - enough said. Saints job is probably the 3rd/4th best behind the Pats, Bears, and maybe Dallas.

Yeah, I don't think enough people understand that the way the Saints give the HC the power and autonomy they do is what a lot of successful teams do. It sure seems that by and large, meddlesome owners and GMs doesn't work as well as those who give a wide berth to the HC.

 

[meily]

McCarthy is a good coach and is easily the safest bet out of the coaches we’ve requested an interview with so far. If we do hire him, I’m not going to complain.

That being said, as others have pointed out, the only question is whether it makes sense given our current situation.

How would this statement not apply to whomever we hire?

I think it's a misnomer the belief that our situation will scare coaches off; McCarthy would be a good hire because he has a proven track record and can right this ship.

My only concern or request is that I think, like others, we want a younger coach who will be here for a while, but a good coach is a good coach, and getting a proven one will always be a better decision than a young up-and-coming one.

 

[GeauxSainz]

Hell why not. Let's geaux!

 

[Centmssaint1]

Work relationships matter. Rosters can be turned over. Cap can be fixed. But jobs where the HC is the clear Alpha in the building and the owner/organization are committed to winning is rare.

Vrable didn't work in Tenn because of GM/owner. Jets imploded because of owner had to fire HC. Carolina QB Young was drafted by owner and HC fired after 1 yr. Jags GM runs it. Raiders - enough said. Saints job is probably the 3rd/4th best behind the Pats, Bears, and maybe Dallas.

I don’t know if the Saints HC job is below that of Dallas. Dallas is just popular based on history. However, since 1995, Dallas has really been a dumpster fire at HC and lack of playoff wins because of the owner.

 

[B4YOU]

I don’t know if the Saints HC job is below that of Dallas. Dallas is just popular based on history. However, since 1995, Dallas has really been a dumpster fire at HC and lack of playoff wins because of the owner.

Yeah, agree and why I said "maybe". Dak's contract is scary and Jones will always put a finger on the scale of football decisions. I think coaching candidates may look at that job as flawed.

 

[JackDiesel]

How would this statement not apply to whomever we hire?

I think it's a misnomer the belief that our situation will scare coaches off; McCarthy would be a good hire because he has a proven track record and can right this ship.

My only concern or request is that I think, like others, we want a younger coach who will be here for a while, but a good coach is a good coach, and getting a proven one will always be a better decision than a young up-and-coming one.

Yeah it's basically McCarthy for 6 years. Good chance he right the ship and gets the team back on track. Glenn for a long time but any time you have a successful OC he gets poached after a couple years. Or Brady who could be here for 20 years or could flame out quickly a decimate an already weak team.

With the way things have been, I'm leaning McCarthy. I think we need stability and to rebuild our reputation.

 

[NewOrleansFan]

Would love McCarthy. He and Payton have very similar career trajectory. Got pushed out of GB by A-Aron and had to deal with JJ in Dallas.

 

[srcampbell]

Is he? Or is he just a terrible fit for the personnel we have right now and are likely stuck with for a bit? He's certainly not worth the cap headache he gives the team.

Based only his QBR Derek Carr is actually underrated. Not saying it’s coming from
you, but I don’t understand the animosity towards Carr.

 

[SuperSaint]

I believe he will either way.

Correct, the cap would fracture if they cut Carr this year, the math isn't there.

 

[Rexman100]

After listening to Loomis presser, it feels like a guy like McCarthy would be at the top of the list. Looks like we will be cleaning house on the coaching staff.

It makes sense for Loomis too. I think he sort of acknowledges that he has to hit on this next coach. MM would assure that.

 

[los226]

I’d rather Brady or Glenn.

 

[Saint Greg]

Yeah, agree and why I said "maybe". Dak's contract is scary and Jones will always put a finger on the scale of football decisions. I think coaching candidates may look at that job as flawed.

Yeah anyone who takes that Dallas job has to love Dak. He’s there for at least two more years. Maybe more if they do any restructuring.

And they have to be cool with Jerry getting in front of a camera after every game and running his mouth on the radio every week.