Don Banks:With our offseason moves so far we have improved to an 11-5 record (1 Viewer)

[Mr. Blue Sky]

If this is true,then why don't you make it complete and become a Cowpie/Texans fan?

Ok...I agree with UT>LSU...but,that's it!!!

It was a joke; he was mocking a former member who is now Permabanned.

 

[CHI-TOWNSAINT]

It was a joke; he was mocking a former member who is now Permabanned.

oh.........

 

[Furious One]

He didn't mention it, but we do have a more favorable schedule this year. The toughest AFC opponet are the Chargers. Here’s a copy of our opponets. You’ll see what I mean. No Indy, No Pats. Although we did wipe at the Jags last year.

New Orleans Saints
Home: Atlanta Falcons, Carolina Panthers, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings, San Francisco 49ers, Oakland Raiders, San Diego Chargers

Away: Atlanta Falcons, Carolina Panthers, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Washington Redskins, Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs

My point is, with our improvments, and not having to start the season against a red hot Superbowl winner, an easier schedule, and no stupid trick plays with 1 minute left on the clock, I think we may be able to pull off Bank’s predition of 11-5.

 

[Da Count]

UT > LSU is a ridiculous statement.

 

[robsmith32]

He didn't mention it, but we do have a more favorable schedule this year. The toughest AFC opponet are the Chargers. Here’s a copy of our opponets. You’ll see what I mean. No Indy, No Pats. Although we did wipe at the Jags last year.

New Orleans Saints
Home: Atlanta Falcons, Carolina Panthers, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings, San Francisco 49ers, Oakland Raiders, San Diego Chargers

Away: Atlanta Falcons, Carolina Panthers, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Washington Redskins, Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs

My point is, with our improvments, and not having to start the season against a red hot Superbowl winner, an easier schedule, and no stupid trick plays with 1 minute left on the clock, I think we may be able to pull off Bank’s predition of 11-5.

considering, we were about 3 plays from 10-6? it's not far fetched to think 11-5. especially with what "appears" to be softer schedule.. granted that may not be so soft when it comes to gameday.

 

[fahad]

I got to see the improvement on the field before i say any thing. I wish we improve big time on both sides.

 

[geauxtigers72]

Texas was a breath away from fivepeating.

And so were the Spurs.

Texas>Louisiana
UT>LSU
Austin>NOLA

WHO WON THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP?????????

 

[JOElittleBIGhorn]

It was a joke; he was mocking a former member who is now Permabanned.

Yes. Don't everybody get your panties in a bundle, it was just a joke. Anybody who didn't get it missed some epic debates on the college board this past season.

Is he really permabanned? I was looking forward to hearing his explanation for the Hornets ownage of the Spurs this year. I'm thinking it would go something like: 4 rings. Two loss national championships don't count. VINCE.

 

[rex]

how good would we be if Gholston is available. We could keep Grant inside.
With our LB core shaped up, all we would need is a CB. Gay will definetely
improve the position by addding much needed depth, he can spell our starters by
rotating in @ saftey, and cb. Maybe our FO has its eyes on Gholston, what do u all think?