JOElittleBIGhorn
Super Forum Fanatic
Offline
I came across this little summary of the Fulmer extension. As an LSU fan, if they offered the same contract to Miles I would be pretty angry. 8 wins a year for a historical powerhouse is not something that should be condoned, let alone rewarded.
Pretty good assessment, read the rest here: http://www.andthevalleyshook.com/2008/7/8/566663/the-worst-college-football
EDIT:
It almost seems like Tennessee is OK with being that kind of program with that last provision. I really think Tennessee should be much better than that.
Some of the details:
* A raise to $2.4 million per season this year, escalating by $150,000 each year thereafter;
* His contract goes through 2014.
We can all question the wisdom of giving a multi-year contract extension to a coach who was on the verge of being fired less than one year ago, and who then signed a rather mediocre recruiting class for the 2008 season. (According to Rivals, there were almost as many 2-stars signed (3) as there were 4-stars (4). Compare to LSU, which in a rather pedestrian signing class got zero 2-stars and thirteen 4-stars. Not that recruiting stars mean everything, but they are a good guide to judge the strength of a class. It's no coincidence that teams that routinely get highly ranked recruiting classes also frequently end up in the top 10 in the country on the field.)
...
But it doesn't stop there:
* $1 million bonus in December 2012;
* Financial incentives for winning the Eastern Division, the SEC, and the National Championship;
* A bonus year added to the contract for each 8-win season.
...
But that last provision is the kicker. It says that Phillip Fulmer is Tennessee's "Coach for Life" as long as he keeps getting 8 wins per season. One would think that an 8-win season would be a major disappointment at Tennessee, but under this agreement, such a mediocre season comes with an automatic vote of confidence and an opportunity to have more mediocre seasons
Pretty good assessment, read the rest here: http://www.andthevalleyshook.com/2008/7/8/566663/the-worst-college-football
EDIT:
Bottom line for me - regardless of talent level through the Majors era and the early part of the Fulmer era, Tennessee was arguably the hardest hitting and most physical team in the conference year-in-and-year-out. Playing Tennessee you knew you were going to see a lot of hitting in the trenches. That is gone now. Our offensive linne really doesn;t strike fear in anyone anymore. And our DL is consistently near the bottom in the conference.
Tennessee is soft. We are winning games becasue the team usually plays relatively smart. But we aren't Tennessee anymore. We are Arkansas, a mid-level team that might make it to Atlanta every few years, but never wins.
It almost seems like Tennessee is OK with being that kind of program with that last provision. I really think Tennessee should be much better than that.