Announcer bias (2 Viewers)

only good things said were when they showed Breeus in the booth
Was it me - Breesus did not seem overly concerned about our situation.

To the OP’s point, there was a narrative last night and we were not it. The Rams were featured in the WSJ and all the TV shows.

Last night was a History Channel WW2 Air Force show and we were the Luftwaffe.
 
Maybe you are in the Holiday spirit cause that’s the only damned reason to think those comments don’t make perfect sense. Well I’m mainly referring to the one about not having three good things to say.
They don't make sense. There are a couple of other comments that make my point.
The facepalm emoji is crude. But I used it to show that I disagree with the comment.
Not to insult somebody. Free exchange of opinions. I'm engaging into the conversation.
 
They don't make sense. There are a couple of other comments that make my point.
The facepalm emoji is crude. But I used it to show that I disagree with the comment.
Not to insult somebody. Free exchange of opinions. I'm engaging into the conversation.
It is disappointing that SaintsReport.com has rules that you must be "Respectful" of other posters but a couple of emjo'si break that rule...

Especially the "Clown" ...
 
Herbstreit and Michaels couldn't talk more about the Rams. It is sickening. You are there to announce the damn game and not show any bias. The Saints make a play, they mention the play, and then back to the Rams appreciation. I hate the Thursday crew. I know other Announcers show bias but this was really bad.
What did the Saints offer.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom